| Model Number |
309.190 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
12/16/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Event date estimated.Reporter is a synthes employee.Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation but has yet to be received.Without a lot number, the device history records review could not be completed as no product was received.The investigation could not be completed, no product was received; no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device is not distributed in the united states but is similar to device marketed in the usa.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported on an unknown date that the patient was underwent a surgery to remove broken screw from the ankle.The bone is healed but surgeon wanted to remove the broken screw body out from bone matrix.Despite the fact technique guide does recommend the use of extraction bolt (designed for 2.7mm cortical screws) to extract 2.4mm cortical screw body but couldn't remove it.The extraction bolt couldn't grab the screw as it designs for.The extraction bolt used could not remove the screw.Thus, the distal part of the screw remained in the patient.After the surgery was over, surgeon tried to use extraction bolt 309.190 to see if could have used this bolt rather than 309.290.Surgeon has used it over the proximal part of the screw (removed from patient).It could grab the screw body but once tried to remove it from the 309.190 extraction bolt, the screw body shear off within the extraction bolt.Extraction bolt is now defective.There was no reported delay.There was no patient consequence.This is report 1 of 3 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h6: the device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This report captures the event that happened intraoperatively wherein extraction bolt could not remove the broken cortex screw body from the bone matrix and the other extraction bolt that sheared the removed proximal part of the screw and became defective wile related complaint (b)(4) for the event wherein the cortex screw broke post-operative.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: b5.D4: lot number; d8 h3, h6: a product investigation was conducted.Visual inspection: the extract-bolt f/scr ø2 (part # 309.190/ lot # 2068535) and 2.4mm cortical screw (part # unk / lot # unk) was received at us cq.The extraction bolt was received with a broken portion of the cortical screw lodged in its distal tip.No visual damage was evident.Functional test: functional testing was not able to be performed as the devices could not be disassembled.The broken portion of the screw cannot be removed thus functional testing could not be performed.Based on the provided information, the complainant used extraction bolt 309.190 on the 2.4mm cortical screw, which it is not designed to extract.The 309.190 extraction bolt was designed to be used with 2.0mm screws.Due to the misuse of the device on a larger screw, the screw broke and jammed within the extraction bolt.The overall complaint was confirmed.The received condition replicates the complaint condition.Dimensional inspection: dimensional inspection could not be performed as the broken portion of the screw could not be removed from the extraction bolt.There was no access to relevant components.Conclusion: the overall complaint was confirmed for the received extract-bolt f/scr ø2 as an unknown 2.4mm cortical screw remained lodged in its distal tip.Although no definitive root-cause can be determined, the extraction bolt was intentionally misused as it was not designed for removal of 2.4mm screws.There was no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.No design issues were observed during the document/specification review.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.H3, h4, h6: a device history record (dhr) review was conducted: part: 309.190; lot: 2068535; manufacturing site: bettlach; release to warehouse date: 10.September 2003; a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.H11 corrected data: b3: event year is reported as 2019; however exact date of event is unknown.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|