|
H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, complaint and lot history review, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), labeling, applicable manufacture records, and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a leak is confirmed; however, the exact cause is unknown.One 5 fr dual lumen powerpicc was returned for evaluation.An initial visual observation showed use residue on the returned sample.Both pinch clamps were observed to be engaged and needleless injection caps were returned on each lumen.The catheter appeared to have been trimmed approximately 2.6 cm distal to the bifurcation.A split was observed in the extension leg tubing of the purple lumen, just within the distal end of the luer hub.A microscopic observation revealed the fracture surfaces of the split were rough and exhibited cracks/fissures and beach marks, which are suggestive of material fatigue.Additional tearing was observed in the extension leg tubing of the purple lumen opposite the split, and the characteristics of the fracture surfaces of this tear were similar to the fracture surfaces of the split.While the exact cause of the split observed in the extension tubing of the returned sample is unknown, possible contributing factors include pulling, twisting, and manipulating the luer connector hub and/or extension leg.A lot history review (lhr) of redu1435 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|