| Model Number |
72203709 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Separation (1562)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
| Date of Event |
12/11/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Foreign zip code: (b)(6).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a rotator cuff repair, the healicoil suture anchor's tip broke on the bone surface.All of the pieces were removed from the patient.It is unknown if another bone hole was required.The procedure was completed without delay using a back-up device.No patient injury or other complications were reported.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6: the reported 4.75mm reusable healicoil rg dilator, used in treatment, has not been returned for evaluation.Without the reported product a visual evaluation cannot be performed and the customers complaint cannot be confirmed.From the information provided, the tip broke off during use.An exact root cause cannot be determined with confidence; however, factors that could have contributed to the reported event include: excessive force applied during use.The instruction for use outlines precautionary statements and instructions in regards to the use of the device to avoid damage or non-functionality.A review of the manufacturing and complaint records was performed for the reported lot, there were no indications that would suggest that the device did not meet product specifications upon release into distribution.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6: the reported 4.75 healicoil rg disposable dilator, used in treatment, has been returned for evaluation.Device lot is over six years old.Visual assessment of the device confirmed the reported complaint.The distal tip has broken off and was not returned.An exact root cause cannot be determined with confidence; however, factors that could have contributed to the reported event include: excessive force applied during use.The instruction for use outlines precautionary statements and instructions in regards to the use of the device to avoid damage or non-functionality.A review of the manufacturing and complaint records was performed for the reported lot, there were no indications that would suggest that the device did not meet product specifications upon release into distribution.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|