MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 97715 |
Device Problems
Energy Output Problem (1431); Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Unexpected Therapeutic Results (1631); Delayed Charge Time (2586); Battery Problem (2885); Charging Problem (2892); Electromagnetic Compatibility Problem (2927)
|
Patient Problems
Device Overstimulation of Tissue (1991); Pain (1994); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271)
|
Event Date 12/13/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was received from a patient who was implanted with a neurostimulator for non-malignant pain.It was reported that the patient didn¿t like their new implantable neurostimulator (ins) and the external components and wished he could go back to their previous system.The patient noted that it takes too long to charge, the ins charge only lasted for three days, he had to charge it two times a weekend, and he had to charge the controller more often too.The new ins was heavier, it was not the same as the old system which the patient preferred, but ¿the new system did what it was supposed to.¿ the patient stated that his pain kept coming back in different places and he was up all hours of the night adjusting the stimulation.On (b)(6) 2020, the patient added that the new system did not have as much coverage areas and it did not do the same features that the old device did.The patient also mentioned that h e wanted the programming to be on the low end, so he experienced the ¿pounding¿ sensation to help his pain; they did not like the high frequency settings.It was also reported that the old system was much faster, charging was faster, it would turn on faster, and operating it was faster.The patient met with a manufacturer representative (rep) on (b)(6) 2020 to ask of there was the option to get his old implant back.A rep mentioned that due to device programming limitations, the patient was unable to adjust the rate from 2-85 on his programs.In the end, the patient was redirected to follow-up with their healthcare professional (hcp) to discuss options.There were no further complications reported or anticipated.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received from a consumer and a manufacturer representative on 2020-jan-09 reporting that the patient was dissatisfied with their current implant.It was not allowing the same parameters as their previous implant.It was reported that the patient felt that since this new implant they had taken 1-2 steps back.They relied on the implant and pain medications.It was also reported that the implantable neurostimulator (ins) was "sabotaging" their apartment.Additional information was received from the consumer on 2020-jan-27 reporting that the new stimulator did not perform as well as the patient's previous system.It was slow to turn on, slow to adjust, and slow to charge with more frequent charge times.Discussions about changing the ins to a non-rechargeable were held but the patient did not want to have more surgeries.No further complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product id 97745, serial# unknown.Product type programmer, patient.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received from the patient.Patient repeated already reported information and also reported that the ins took 2 hours to charge up, he couldn¿t get the settings to the same level that his previous ones were set at.Patient stated he wanted the controller to stay unlocked and he wanted to be able to adjust the rate all at once.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|