| Model Number |
G50617 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
12/17/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) #: k163018 investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
There was stenosis (3cm in length) in the upper bile duct.The delivery system of the zilbs was advanced to the target site over olympus's wire guide visiglide 0.025inch, but the tip of the delivery system became caught on the stenosis, which made the user unable to advanced it any further and the tip of the delivery system became deformed as well.Therefore, another manufacturer's device was used instead to complete the procedure.There have been no adverse effects to the patient reported.Fda mdr reporting required: event is fda mdr reportable based on the device malfunction reporting precedence for this device family for the issue of ¿delivery system kinks'.No adverse effects to the patient have been reported as occurring.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
There was stenosis (3cm in length) in the upper bile duct.The delivery system of the zilbs was advanced to the target site over olympus's wire guide visiglide 0.025inch, but the tip of the delivery system became caught on the stenosis, which made the user unable to advanced it any further and the tip of the delivery system became deformed as well.Therefore, another manufacturer's device was used instead to complete the procedure.There have been no adverse effects to the patient reported.Fda mdr reporting required: event is fda mdr reportable based on the device malfunction reporting precedence for this device family for the issue of ¿delivery system kinks'.No adverse effects to the patient have been reported as occurring.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) #: k163018.Device evaluation: the zilbs-635-8-4 device of lot number c1542464 involved in this complaint was returned for evaluation, with the original packaging.The packaging was open on receipt.With the information provided, a physical examination and document based investigation was conducted.Lab evaluation: the device related to this occurrence underwent a laboratory evaluation on the 09 january 2020.The returned device lab examination findings and observations can be referred through attached photos.On evaluation of the device a kink was observed at the distal white tip of the device, fish-mouth damage was observed on the distal white tip and crinkling of the outer sheath at approx.3.0 cm to 10.0 cm from the distal white tip was observed.Document review: prior to distribution zilbs-635-8-4 devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.A review of the manufacturing records for zilbs-635-8-4 of lot number c1542464 did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.The review of relevant manufacturing records, confirms the failure mode has not previously occurred with the current lot number.Based on the information available to date, there is no evidence to suggest that there are any manufacturing issues associated with lot number c1542464.The instructions for use (b)(4) states the following: ¿if the wire guide or delivery system cannot be advanced through the obstructed area, do not attempt to place the stent.¿ it should be noted that the ifu and packaging label indicate that a 0.035¿ wire guide is recommended for use with this device.There is evidence to suggest the user did not follow the ifu.The japanese packaging insert (c-es1207m03) supplied with the device complies with mhlw law no.84 of 2013 which avoids including information that is not specific to the medical device or that which is basic knowledge already understood by the healthcare professional, to ensure to accurately convey all the information that is important for the user.Root cause review: a definitive root cause could be attributed to the use of a non-recommended wire guide with the device.From the information provided it is known that a 0.025¿ wire guide was used with the device.It is also known that the patient had a stenosis in the upper bile duct which the delivery system became caught on during advancement.It is possible that the use of a non-recommended wire guide resulted in insufficient device support likely contributing to the difficulty encountered during advancement.The damage observed on the device during the lab evaluation likely occurred as a result of the difficulty encountered during advancement.Summary: the complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|