|
The reason for this revision surgery was reported as patient subsided.The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 1 year and 5 months apart.The healthcare professional indicated there was no significant adverse event.There was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The devices were no returned and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the device history records show that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There were no non-conforming material report (ncmr) associated with the products that may have contributed to the reported event.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration dates at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to subsidence of stem.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate that the reported devices were defective.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may contribute to an event that are outside the control of djo surgical such as inadequate soft tissue support, excessive range of motion, poor bone density, patient bone deterioration, patient noncompliance with medical instructions, excessive loading, patient activities or trauma.There was no information submitted with this complaint about any patient activities, accidents, or medical contraindications that may have contributed to the reported event.
|