• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARL ZEISS MEDITEC CATARACT TECHNOLOGY, INC. MILOOP LENS FRAGMENTATION DEVICE; OPHTHALMIC HOOK

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARL ZEISS MEDITEC CATARACT TECHNOLOGY, INC. MILOOP LENS FRAGMENTATION DEVICE; OPHTHALMIC HOOK Back to Search Results
Model Number FG-11881
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Capsular Bag Tear (2639); Vitrectomy (2643)
Event Date 12/18/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was discarded by the user facility and was not available for evaluation.The device history records were reviewed for this manufacturing lot and there were no discrepancies or unusual findings that relate to the reported event.According to the surgeon, the posterior capsule tear could have occurred at any one of three times during the procedure: during the original sweep with miloop (a single bisection was performed).During irrigation/aspiration.During lens insertion - it was noted that the iol did not exit the delivery cartridge in the proper orientation and had to be rotated into position with a second instrument.The surgeon's subsequent surgeries with the miloop were uneventful.Capsular bag damage is an inherent risk of cataract surgery.Manufacturer's reference #: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
A patient underwent cataract surgery in the right eye on (b)(6) 2019 where the miloop was used to section the cataractous lens into fragments.The surgeon noticed a tear in the posterior capsule after the intraocular lens was inserted into the capsular bag.An anterior vitrectomy was performed and the iol haptics were placed in the sulcus with the optic in the capsular bag; no sutures were required.The patient's one day postoperative visual acuity was 20/30.The relationship between the capsular damage and the miloop is not known.Additional information has been requested.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer's reference #: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
Postoperatively the patient is stable, the eye is quiet, and there was no loss of best corrected visual acuity.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MILOOP LENS FRAGMENTATION DEVICE
Type of Device
OPHTHALMIC HOOK
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARL ZEISS MEDITEC CATARACT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
8748 technology way
reno NV 89521
MDR Report Key9599340
MDR Text Key189049080
Report Number3012123033-2020-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HNQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/12/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/16/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2022
Device Model NumberFG-11881
Device Lot NumberFG19072601
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/10/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
INTRAOCULAR LENS DELIVERY SYSTEM, INTRAOCULAR LENS; PHACOEMULSIFICATION EQUIPMENT
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-