Check of the dhr: by checking the manufacturing charts of the involved lot#s, no pre-existing anomaly was detected.This is the first and only complaint received on these lot #s.Explant and xrays analysis: not available for analysis.Based on the few information received, we cannot identify the root cause of the event.However, stating that: no further complaints were received on these lot #s.Primary surgery was performed more than 4 years before revision.No pre-existing anomaly were detected.Surgeon hypothesized that possible cause for pain was slight erosion of the rotator cuff.We judged this case as not product related.Pms data: according to our pms data, we are aware of only 3 cases of revision of smr resurfacing system due to pain on more than (b)(4) smr resurfacing system implanted since 2006, giving an occurence rate of (b)(4)%.No corrective action implemented for this specific case.Limacorporate will keep the market monitored.Please, consider this mdr as a final report.
|
Revision surgery performed on (b)(6) 2020 due to pain.Primary surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2015.During revision, resurfacing head (not registered in usa) and stem code 1317.15.020 lot#1501404 were replaced with smr anatomic system.According to the information reported, surgeon was unsure of reason for pain, but possibly it was due to slight erosion of the rotator cuff.However there was sufficient cuff to convert to anatomic as opposed to a reverse.Patient was fairly fit and active (b)(6) year old male.Event occurred in (b)(6).
|