• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS PERMACOL; MESH, SURGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS PERMACOL; MESH, SURGICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number P152030
Medical Device Problem Codes Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Abdominal Pain (1685); Adhesion(s) (1695); Fistula (1862); Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding (1888); Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Failure of Implant (1924); Perforation (2001); Tachycardia (2095); Thrombus (2101); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348); Impaired Healing (2378); Blood Loss (2597); No Code Available (3191); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient's attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of a hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced mesh failure and adhesions.Post-implant treatment included adhesion removal, bowel resection, and ileostomy.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Patient codes - c64343 (decrease in hemocrit, hostile abdomen) medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient's attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of a parastomal hernia.It was reported that after the implant, the patient experienced tachycardic, hypotensive, decrease in hematocrit, adhesions, clot, hostile abdomen, recurrence, mesh failure, serosal tear, fistulas, perforations, abdominal pain, and bleeding.Post-operative patient treatment included revision surgery, hernia repair with new mesh, partial removal of mesh, serosal tear repaired, abdominal washout, abdominal wall closure, removal of tacks, received several units of blood, arterial line placement, lysis of adhesions, primary closure of parastomal hernia medially, bowel resection, ileostomy, relocation of ileostomy, and taken to sicu.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient's attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of a parastomal hernia.It was reported that after the implant, the patient experienced tachycardic, hypotensive, decrease in hematocrit, adhesions, clot, hostile abdomen, recurrence, mesh failure, serosal tear, fistulas, perforations, abdominal pain, open wound, and bleeding.Post-operative patient treatment included revision surgery, hernia repair with new mesh, partial removal of mesh, serosal tear repaired, abdominal washout, abdominal wall closure, removal of tacks, received several units of blood, arterial line placement, lysis of adhesions, primary closure of parastomal hernia medially, bowel resection, ileostomy, relocation of ileostomy, wound vac, and taken to sicu.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERMACOL
Common Device Name
MESH, SURGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS
116 avenue du formans
trevoux 01600
FR  01600
MDR Report Key9618145
Report Number9617613-2020-00019
Device Sequence Number2676962
Product Code FTM
UDI-Device Identifier10884523000115
UDI-Public10884523000115
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNY
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K120605
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2009
Device Explanted Year2011
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/23/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2011
Device Model NumberP152030
Device Catalogue NumberP152030
Device Lot Number08B1609
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/08/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/03/2020
04/07/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/22/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/25/2020
04/23/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Weight86
-
-