|
Investigation / evaluation: the complaint facility (b)(6) informed cook on 06jan2020 of an incident involving a check-flo extra large introducer (xvcfw-20.0-35-40) from lot: 10033071.The device reportedly leaked during a branched thoracic endograft procedure on (b)(6) 2020.Communication with the user facility clarified that no additional means of intervention have been taken as a result of this event.The patient reportedly experienced no adverse effects as a result of this incident, and no additional harm was reported.A review of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), drawing, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions (mi), and quality control (qc), as well as a visual inspection and functional test of the returned device, was conducted during the investigation.One used check-flo extra large introducer was returned to cook for evaluation.Upon visual inspection of the full assembly, no damage to the silicone disc was noted.The check-flo assembly was dis-assembled to more closely examine the discs, revealing a tear on the top slit of the first disc.No further damage was noted to the top disc and no damage was noted to the remaining two discs.A functional leak test was performed by closing the sheath lumen using a hemostat and flushing the device using a syringe, which found that the device did not leak when the dilator was not inserted nor when the dilator was completely inserted.However, the device did leak when the dilator was just partially inserted.Based on the tear found on the top of the first disc, it is likely that the damage was caused by the dilator or the introduced device being inserted off-center into the check-flo assembly.Cook has concluded that the device was manufactured to specifications.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the design history file (dhf) showed that this device is both safe and effective for its intended use.A review of the dhrs for the reported complaint device lot: (10033071) and the related subassembly lots revealed three related non-conformances for "incorrect slit in the disc" and one related non-conformance for "tear in the valve disc" in which all four devices were scrapped prior to final qc and distribution.A database search revealed no other events associated with the reported device lot.As adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot related complaints have been received from the field, cook has concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in the field.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The product ifu, t_intro_rev2 ¿introducers,¿ provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: ¿precautions: the maximum diameter of the instrument or catheter to be introduced should be determined to ensure its passage through the introducer.All instruments or catheters used with this product should move freely through the valve and sheath.Damage to the valve/introducer may result when the fit is tight.When inserting, manipulating or withdrawing a device through an introducer always maintain introducer position.Instructions for use: sheath introduction: 1.Upon removal from package, ensure the inner diameter (id) of the introducer is appropriate for the maximum diameter of the instrument or catheter to be introduced.How supplied: upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ based on the information provided, inspection of the returned product, and the results of the investigation, a definitive root cause for this event has been traced to unintended user error.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|