|
The complainant made no indication of any omnilife science device malfunction or deficiency related to the identity, quality, durability, reliability, safety, effectiveness or device performance contributing to the adverse event.Review of the manufacturing documentation and sterilization documentation for the devices in question revealed no deviation from process or non-conformity of product that would have caused or contributed to the adverse event.
|
|
A complaint was initiated for a patient who underwent a second knee revision surgery on (b)(6) 2020.The first revision surgery occured on (b)(6) 2016 and the original surgery occured on (b)(6) 2010.The reason for revision is reported pain.During this revision, the original stem was explanted and replaced with non-omni product, and the neck implanted during the first revision surgery was removed and replaced within-omni product.
|