• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL TCK1 HD CAMERA HEAD; ENDOSCOPIC VIDEO CAMERA

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL TCK1 HD CAMERA HEAD; ENDOSCOPIC VIDEO CAMERA Back to Search Results
Model Number 242400
Device Problem Intermittent Continuity (1121)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 01/01/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Initial reporter phone number: (b)(6).Udi: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported by the affiliate by customer's email that during pre surgery check the tck1 hd camera head gets relayed sometimes and goes off sometimes and does not work properly.No patient consequence and no surgical delay was reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: additional information: b5: subsequent follow-up with the customer, additional information was received.It was reported that the event occurred regularly during a regular check and not during a specific case.It was reported that there were no patient consequences or impact to the user or patient.It was unknown if there was a delay.It was unknown if the case was completed.It was unknown if an alternative device was readily available.It was unknown if there was a surgical intervention planned (e.G.X-rays, additional/change in procedures, prescriptions, otc, revisions).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d10, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: according to the information provided, it was reported that the unit was not working properly or continuously.The complaint unit was received at the service center and evaluated.During evaluation, connection issues were identified on the camera head.Per service operational and diagnostic, the unit was found to be non-repairable and it is being placed into long term hold.Therefore this complaint was confirmed.The possible root cause for the reported failure was thus identified as defective camera head, however it cannot be conclusively affirmed.As a potential cause cannot be associated to manufacturing, therefore a manufacturing record evaluation is not required.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Udi:(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TCK1 HD CAMERA HEAD
Type of Device
ENDOSCOPIC VIDEO CAMERA
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ  02400
MDR Report Key9655642
MDR Text Key200200527
Report Number1221934-2020-00408
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FWF
UDI-Device Identifier10886705026258
UDI-Public10886705026258
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/22/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/31/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number242400
Device Catalogue Number242400
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/17/2020
Date Manufacturer Received02/26/2020
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-