• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA RADIFOCUS GLIDEWIRE ADVANTAGE TRACK; WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA RADIFOCUS GLIDEWIRE ADVANTAGE TRACK; WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number RA*GB14301C
Medical Device Problem Code Material Separation (1562)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Date of Event 01/15/2020
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
The user facility reported that the during a trial of the new glidewire advantage track wires, one of the.014 wires snapped off inside the patient after one pass.The wire snapped at the joint and put a screeching halt to the case.The patient's condition was stable and okay, the procedure outcome was a success.Additional information was received on 16jan2020.It was a peripheral intervention/cli case.The wire entered the patient through a 4/5 slender sheath in the posterior tibial artery.The wire was located and still is in the patient's posterior tibial artery; the wire was not retrieved.The doctor had to gain access in a different vessel (the anterior tibial) and finished the case via that access site.The wire breaking off in the posterior tibial artery changed what his whole game plan was for intervention.The patient was not hospitalized for a longer period.Additional information was received on 20jan2020.The patient had stenosis and calcification.The patient was reported to be fine and the case was able to be completed successfully.The length of the wire remained inside the patient was 40mm (4cm).The wire snapped approximately 4cm from the distal tip of the wire.The doctor uses a technique where he loops the wire, then pushes and twists the wire to cross lesions.It is a very common tactic he uses to cross tight lesions.This time, he looped the wire one time, pushed the wire forward, while twisting at the same time and advanced the wire through the lesion.After he passed the lesion, almost immediately upon "undoing" the loop he had previously created, the distal 4cm of the wire snapped off in the patient's posterior tobias artery.This was a setback in the case because it shut down the patient's posterior tibial artery and caused the doctor to have to use a different access site to complete the case.Once the wire snapped, the doctor was unable to complete the case from the pt artery.He had to gain access in the patient's anterior tibial artery in order to proceed.It was not a favorable location to complete the case from.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RADIFOCUS GLIDEWIRE ADVANTAGE TRACK
Common Device Name
WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, 418
JA  418
MDR Report Key9664528
Report Number2243441-2020-00007
Device Sequence Number16268854
Product Code DQX
UDI-Device Identifier04987350727886
UDI-Public04987350727886
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Importer
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 02/04/2020
Report Date (Section F) 02/04/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2021
Device Model NumberRA*GB14301C
Device Catalogue NumberGAT1430
Device Lot Number191103
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Distributor Facility Aware Date01/15/2020
Device Age2 MO
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer01/16/2020
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/04/2020
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient Age66 YR
Patient Weight74
Date Report Sent to FDA02/04/2020
-
-