• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON DICKINSON UNSPECIFIED BD¿ PEN NEEDLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON DICKINSON UNSPECIFIED BD¿ PEN NEEDLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Defective Device (2588)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Date of Event 01/17/2020
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Date of event: unknown.The date received by manufacturer has been used for this field.Unknown manufacturer: there are multiple bd locations where this unspecified bd device may have been manufactured.A catalog and lot number could not be confirmed for this incident and without this information we are unable to determine where the device was manufactured.Therefore, bd corporate headquarters in (b)(4) has been listed and the (b)(4) fda registration number has been used for the manufacture report number.Medical device expiration date: unknown.Device manufacture date: unknown.Investigation summary: level a investigation complaint evaluation / complaint history check for the event(s) that occurred.Severity: s_1__; occurrence: unable to perform complaint lot history check due to an unknown lot number for needle broken npe & needle bent pe.Investigation summary: customer returned (1) open 4mm, 32g pen needle without the tear drop label, inner shield, or outer cover.Customer states that the needle is bent and the rear cannula end is broken.The returned pen needle was examined and exhibited a bent patient end of the cannula and a broken non patient end of the cannula.Unable to perform dhr check due to an unknown lot number for needle broken npe & needle bent pe.Investigation conclusion: based on the samples and/or photo(s) received the investigation concluded: confirmed: bd was able to duplicate or confirm the customer¿s indicated failure.Complaints received for this device and reported condition will continue to be tracked and trended.Information will be captured on trend reports and monitored monthly.Our business team regularly reviews the collected data for identification of emerging trends.Root cause description: user error.No evidence of manufacturing related issues were observed on the returned samples.It is bd¿s experience that the non-patient end breakage and bending is directly associated with the placing of the needle onto the pen device by the user.If the non-patient end of the needle is not placed centrally to the pen device, then instead of the non-patient end of the needle piercing the rubber septum of the vial, it hits hard material and can be bent/broken when fitted to the pen.Rationale: based on the investigation, no additional investigation and no capa is required at this time.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that unspecified bd¿ pen needle cannula broke and got stuck.The needle was also bent.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: material no.: unknown batch no.: unknown.It was reported that the rear cannula was broken and gets stuck.It was also reported the needle was bent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNSPECIFIED BD¿ PEN NEEDLE
Common Device Name
PEN NEEDLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON DICKINSON
1 becton drive
franklin lakes NJ 07417
MDR Report Key9667871
Report Number2243072-2020-00137
Device Sequence Number714580
Product Code FMI
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNJ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
UNKNOWN
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source distributor,other
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 01/20/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/31/2020
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/17/2020
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/04/2020
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
-
-