CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. DIAMONDBACK 360 PERIPHERAL ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM; PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY DEVICE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number DBP-125MICRO145 |
Device Problem
Entrapment of Device (1212)
|
Patient Problem
Vascular Dissection (3160)
|
Event Date 01/09/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported oad and guide wire were received for analysis.The oad and guide wire were engaged, and resistance was felt in the area of the oad crown when removing the guide wire from the oad.Adhered biological material was observed on the oad crown.Examination of the area of adhered material did not reveal any damage that would have contributed to the accumulation.The morphology and exact root cause of the accumulating material is unknown.Examination of the driveshaft revealed some adhered material embedded within the driveshaft filars.Suspected shipping damaged was removed, and the guide wire was able to be advanced through the oad, including the area of adhered material.The oad was tested, spun at all speeds, and functioned as intended.At the conclusion of device analysis, the reported event of the device being stuck on the wire was confirmed.The reported dissection was unable to be confirmed through analysis.The device history record for this oad lot number has been reviewed.No issues or discrepancies were noted during this review that would have contributed to the reported event.The device met material, assembly, and quality control requirements.The material inspection report for the reported guide wire was unable to be reviewed, as the lot number was not provided.The diamondback peripheral orbital atherectomy device instructions for use states that dissection is a possible adverse event which can occur with use of the diamondback peripheral orbital atherectomy device.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
During a procedure, the peripheral pluto orbital atherectomy device (oad) became stuck on the guide wire and a dissection occurred.The target, chronic total occluded (cto) lesion was located in the posterior tibial (pt) artery.The lesion was initially wired with a non-csi guide wire, and the wire was exchanged for a viperwire guide wire.Prior to orbital atherectomy treatment, the oad was stuck on the guide wire.The oad and guide wire were removed and the vessel was re-wired.The original oad was re-introduced to the patient over the second guide wire.After treatment, the oad was again stuck on the guide wire.The oad and guide wire were removed together from the patient.Subsequently, a dissection was observed, the vessel was re-wired with a non-csi guide wire, and the dissection was treated with a stent.After stenting, it was noted that the non-csi guide wire and stent were located in the dissection plane and not in the vessel.The opinion of the physician was that the initial non-csi guide wire was subintimal and created an initial minor dissection which was exacerbated when the oad was used to treat the vessel.A distal pt access was obtained to assess the severity of the dissection.It was noted that the patient was fine throughout the procedure.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|