• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIATHLON PRIM BEAD PA SZE6 BP; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIATHLON PRIM BEAD PA SZE6 BP; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO Back to Search Results
Model Number 5526-B-600
Medical Device Problem Code Unstable (1667)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Injury (2348)
Date of Event 12/17/2019
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.If additional information is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
Knee revision due to instability.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding instability involving a triathlon baseplate was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: a material analysis has been performed.The report concluded: the damage on the articulating surface of the insert was consistent with burnishing, scratching, and third body indentations; which are common damage modes of uhmwpe.Damage consistent with material loss due to delamination was observed on the posterior portion of the condyles.Yellow discoloration consistent with synovial fluid absorption was observed on the tibial insert.Damage consistent with articulation against a hard object/particulate was observed on the femoral component.Nothing noteworthy was observed on the tibial baseplate.Based on the given information, no identifiable materials or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the surfaces examined.-clinician review: a review of the provided medical records and x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: patient underwent a pressfit left tka on 03/10/2011 for advanced varus tricompartmental osteoarthritis.The lateral view post- operative x-ray taken a week later demonstrate that the tibia had been resected in excessive slope (~15degrees).A lateral view x-ray taken 8 years later shows similar findings however the femur is now 50% subluxed posteriorly confirming the instability noted in the operative report.-product history review: indicated all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: a review of the provided medical records and x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: the amount of posterior resection seen on the lateral x-rays would compromise the attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament.Without the constraint of the pcl the femur readily subluxes.No further investigation is required at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event or Problem Description
Knee revision due to instability.
 
Event or Problem Description
Knee revision due to instability.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding instability involving a triathlon baseplate was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: a material analysis has been performed.The report concluded: the damage on the articulating surface of the insert was consistent with burnishing, scratching, and third body indentations; which are common damage modes of uhmwpe.Damage consistent with material loss due to delamination was observed on the posterior portion of the condyles.Yellow discoloration consistent with synovial fluid absorption was observed on the tibial insert.Damage consistent with articulation against a hard.Object/particulate was observed on the femoral component.Nothing noteworthy was observed on the tibial baseplate.Based on the given information, no identifiable materials or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the surfaces examined.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical records and x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: patient underwent a pressfit left tka on (b)(6)2011 for advanced varus tricompartmental osteoarthritis.The lateral view post- operative x-ray taken a week later demonstrate that the tibia had been resected in excessive slope (~15degrees).A lateral view x-ray taken 8 years later shows similar findings however the femur is now 50% subluxed posteriorly confirming the instability noted in the operative report.Product history review: indicated all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: a review of the provided medical records and x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: the amount of posterior resection seen on the lateral x-rays would compromise the attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament.Without the constraint of the pcl the femur readily subluxes.No further investigation is required at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRIATHLON PRIM BEAD PA SZE6 BP
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
MDR Report Key9689033
Report Number0002249697-2020-00247
Device Sequence Number16981935
Product Code MBH
UDI-Device Identifier07613327041361
UDI-Public07613327041361
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountrySE
PMA/510(K) Number
K141056
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2011
Device Explanted Year2019
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source health professional,other
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/15/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2016
Device Model Number5526-B-600
Device Catalogue Number5526B600
Device Lot NumberSY6AK
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/07/2020
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/13/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/06/2020
05/06/2020
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/10/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/29/2020
07/15/2020
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient Weight42
-
-