| Model Number |
1074250-38 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Deflation Problem (1149); Difficult to Remove (1528); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
01/23/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).The device is expected to be returned for investigation.It has not yet been received.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.The 2.5x30 mm trek referenced and the 4.0x18 mm xience xpedition referenced are being filed under separate medwatch report numbers.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the 2.5x30 mm trek dilatation catheter was inflated three times in the calcified mid left anterior descending (lad) coronary artery.It was inflated at 14 atmospheres (atms), 20 atms and 18 atms when the trek ruptured.During removal of the trek, the balloon separated and remained in the artery.Attempts made to remove/snare out the separated segment of the trek were not successful.A vessel perforation occurred in the mid lad during use of a non-abbott dilatation catheter, but the patient remained stable.The 2.5x38 mm xience xpedition stent was deployed at 12 atms for 15 sec, then 12 atm for 22 sec, then 20 atm for 15 sec, and 5 atm for 11 sec in the mid lad over the separated trek balloon; however, the stent delivery system (sds) did not fully deflate and was difficult to remove from the guide catheter, so the sds and guide catheter were removed together as a unit.The patient remained stable.A 3.5x38 mm xience xpedition stent was implanted in the proximal lad and a 4.0x12 mm xience xpedition stent was implanted in the ostial left main coronary artery.A 4.0 x 18 mm xience xpedition stent was implanted in the predilated left main to left circumflex.After post dilatation of the 4.0x18 mm xpedition stent using a non-abbott dilatation catheter, the blood pressure dropped and cardiac arrest occurred.There was no reflow in the lad.The patient was ventilated and three doses of epinephrine were administered, but the blood pressure was gone.No further attempts to resuscitate the patient were performed because the patient was a do not resuscitate.The patient expired.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was returned for analysis.The reported deflation issues were not confirmed.The reported difficulty to remove was confirmed through observation.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.It should be noted that the xience xpedition everolimus eluting coronary stent system instruction for use (ifu) states: do not exceed the labeled rated burst pressure.In this case, it is unknown if the instruction for use (ifu) deviation related to inflation above rated burst pressure (rbp) contributed to the reported event.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported deflation issues as no issue was identified during return device analysis; however, it should be noted that the device was returned frozen in the guiding catheter and partially inflated with stretching in the inner and outer member.The reported difficulty to remove the device appears to be related to operational context of the procedure as it is likely the partially inflated balloon interacted with the guiding catheter.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|