• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EXACTECH, INC. EXACTECH; PATELLA

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EXACTECH, INC. EXACTECH; PATELLA Back to Search Results
Model Number 200-01-02
Medical Device Problem Code Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth (4002)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Failure of Implant (1924)
Date of Event 09/12/2012
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This submission represents 1 of 163 events identified via active surveillance activities utilizing data form the (b)(6) national joint registry ((b)(6)).Follow-ups for additional information cannot be performed for this complaint as the information was submitted as complete by the registry; there is no identification of facilities or surgeons.All available information about the event and/or patient has been provided and it is not possible to obtain any of the devices.Additional information, including the product investigation, will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported by (b)(6) national joint registry ((b)(6)), this (b)(6) y/o, female patient underwent primary total prosthetic replacement using cement of the right knee via medial parapatellar approach on (b)(6) 2005.The indication for the index procedure was osteoarthritis.On (b)(6) 2012, approximately 84 months post implantation, the patient underwent revision due to aseptic loosening of the patella.The follow-ups for additional information cannot be performed for this complaint, information was submitted as complete by the (b)(6) national joint registry ((b)(6)); there is no identification of facilities or surgeons.All available information about the event and/or patient has been provided.These devices are used for treatment not diagnosis.It is found in a review of the labeling and ifu 700-096-004, it is known that device specific risks consist of: fracture, migration, loosening, subluxation, or dislocation of the prothesis or any of its components, any of which may require a second surgical intervention or revision.As part of the preoperative assessment, the surgeon must ensure that no biological, biomechanical, or other factors exist that might adversely affect the surgery and/or postoperative period.Revisions or surgical interventions are a known complication found in joint replacements.All patients should be instructed on the limitations of the prosthesis and the possibility of subsequent surgery.The patient should be cautioned to monitor activities and protect the replaced joint from unreasonable stresses and follow the written instructions of the physician with respect to follow-up care and treatment.The surgeon must be fully knowledgeable about all aspects of the surgical technique to use the implants in accordance with the indications and contraindications and be trained according to the proper use of the system instrumentation and implants.It is a known complication that a patient¿s age, weight, or activity level would cause the surgeon to expect early failure of the system.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section h10: (h3) the engineering evaluation noted the revision reported was likely the result of patella loosening.However, this cannot be confirmed since the devices were not returned for evaluation and no information regarding the patella component originally implanted was provided.This submission represents 1 of 163 events identified via active surveillance activities utilizing data form the united kingdom national joint registry (uknjr).Follow-ups for additional information cannot be performed for this complaint as the information was submitted as complete by the registry; there is no identification of facilities or surgeons.All available information about the event and/or patient has been provided and it is not possible to obtain any of the devices.Section h11: corrections made in the following section(s): (d1) brand name.(d2) product code and common device name.(d4) catalog number, serial number, exp date, and udi number are all unknown.(g5) 510k number is unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section h10: (h3) the engineering evaluation noted the revision reported was likely the result of patella loosening.However, this cannot be confirmed since the devices were not returned for evaluation and no information regarding the patella component originally implanted was provided.This submission represents 1 of 163 events identified via active surveillance activities utilizing data form the united kingdom national joint registry (uknjr).Follow-ups for additional information cannot be performed for this complaint as the information was submitted as complete by the registry; there is no identification of facilities or surgeons.All available information about the event and/or patient has been provided and it is not possible to obtain any of the devices.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EXACTECH
Common Device Name
PATELLA
Manufacturer (Section D)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
MDR Report Key9709856
Report Number1038671-2020-00135
Device Sequence Number2449551
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier10885862039521
UDI-Public10885862039521
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUK
PMA/510(K) Number
UNK
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2005
Device Explanted Year2012
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/05/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/14/2010
Device Model Number200-01-02
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/15/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/28/2020
04/28/2020
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/13/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/29/2020
05/05/2020
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
UNK.
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age70 YR
-
-