|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventralight st on (b)(6) 2017.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventralight st.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with large incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventrio st.Per op notes, ¿the hernia sac was identified, reduced and excised.Adhesions were lysed.A ventrio st was placed and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2019 - patient was diagnosed with intrabdominal abscess collection thereby underwent open repair with drainage of abscess.Per op notes,¿ the abdominal wall abscess was identified and drained.¿ (b)(6) 2019 - patient was diagnosed with intrabdominal fluid collection thereby underwent open repair with drainage of fluid.Per op notes, ¿the anterior abdominal wall mesh was identified with fluid and drained.¿ (b)(6) 2019 - patient was diagnosed with infected mesh, pelvic abscess and small bowel fistula thereby underwent open repair with partial excision of ventrio st.Per op notes, ¿the small bowel was adherent to the abdominal wall was taken down.The mesh appeared to be yellow that central part was removed.Upon removing of mesh, a loop of small bowel and abscess was identified.Abscess was drained.The small bowel fistula was identified and removed.A drain was placed.¿ (b)(6) 2019 - patient was diagnosed with infected mesh and small bowel fistula thereby underwent open repair with excision of ventrio st.Per op notes, ¿the small bowel with abscess was identified and drained.The prior mesh appeared to be loose and pulled away.The mesh was excised.The location of the fistula was identified and removed.The fascial edges and soft tissues were necrotic.An enterostomy tube was placed and sutured.¿.
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct the date of implant, brand name and 510(k).Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-apr-2017) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, a4, b3, b4, b5, b6, b7, d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot no., udi no., expiry date), d6.B (date of explant), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10, h11.Corrected field: d.6a(date of implant), d1 (brand name), g4 (pma/510(k) #) note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : not returned.
|