|
This submission represents 1 of 163 events identified via active surveillance activities utilizing data form the (b)(6).Follow-ups for additional information cannot be performed for this complaint as the information was submitted as complete by the registry; there is no identification of facilities or surgeons.All available information about the event and/or patient has been provided and it is not possible to obtain any of the devices.Additional information, including the product investigation, will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
|
As reported by (b)(6), this (b)(6) y/o, female patient underwent primary total prosthetic replacement using cement of the left knee via medial parapatellar approach on (b)(6) 2010.The indication for the index procedure was osteoarthritis.The patient was implanted with a optetrak knee system - cemented posterior stabilised (ps) femoral component - size 2 (catalog 204-01-02, serial (b)(4)), optetrak knee system - cemented finned tibial tray - sizes 1f/3t 2f/3t (catalog 200-04-23, serial (b)(4)), optetrak knee system - posterior stabilised (ps) tibial insert - size 2 - 15mm (catalog 204-22-15, serial (b)(4)), optetrak knee system - three pegs patella - diameter 35mm (catalog 200-02-35, serial (b)(4)) and heraeus medical antibiotic loaded high viscosity bone cement (catalog 66017569, serial (b)(4)).On (b)(6) 2018, approximately 98 months post implantation, the patient underwent revision due to aseptic loosening tibia.The exactech femoral component removed; tibial component removed; tibial liner component removed and replaced with pfc« sigma tc3 femoral left size 2, mbt revision tibial tray cemented size 2, tc3 rp tibial insert size 2 10mm.
|
|
The evaluation noted that revision reported was likely the result of an insufficient bond between the implant and the bone, which led to aseptic (non-infected) loosening.However, this cannot be confirmed since the devices were not returned for evaluation.This submission represents 1 of 163 events identified via active surveillance activities utilizing data form the united kingdom national joint registry (uknjr).Follow-ups for additional information cannot be performed for this complaint as the information was submitted as complete by the registry; there is no identification of facilities or surgeons.All available information about the event and/or patient has been provided and it is not possible to obtain any of the devices.
|