| Model Number |
LOGIC CR FEMORAL CEM, LEFT, SZ 3 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth (4002)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
11/08/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This submission represents 1 of 163 events identified via active surveillance activities utilizing data form the (b)(6) national joint registry (uknjr).Follow-ups for additional information cannot be performed for this complaint as the information was submitted as complete by the registry; there is no identification of facilities or surgeons.All available information about the event and/or patient has been provided and it is not possible to obtain any of the devices.Additional information, including the product investigation, will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported by (b)(6) national joint registry (uknjr), this (b)(6) y/o, male patient underwent primary total prosthetic replacement using cement of the left knee via medial parapatellar approach on (b)(6) 2013.The indication for the index procedure was osteoarthritis.The patient was implanted with a logic - cruciate retaining - cemented femoral component - left - size 3 (catalog 02-010-03-0230, serial (b)(4), logic - fit - cemented tibial tray - size 3f/3t (catalog 02-012-45-3030, serial (b)(4), logic - cruciate retaining tibial insert - size 3 11mm slope + (catalog 02-012-48-3011, serial (b)(4) and stryker antibiotic loaded medium viscosity bone cement (catalog 61971001, serial (b)(4).On (b)(6) 2018, approximately 59 months post implantation, the patient underwent revision due to aseptic loosening patella.The exactech were removed and replaced.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The engineering evaluation noted the revision reported was likely the result of patella loosening.However, this cannot be confirmed since the devices were not returned for evaluation and no information regarding the patella component originally implanted was provided.This submission represents 1 of 163 events identified via active surveillance activities utilizing data form the (b)(6).Follow-ups for additional information cannot be performed for this complaint as the information was submitted as complete by the registry; there is no identification of facilities or surgeons.All available information about the event and/or patient has been provided and it is not possible to obtain any of the devices.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|