• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO. KG PROGAV 2.0 VALVE; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO. KG PROGAV 2.0 VALVE; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX410T
Device Problem Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Patient Problem Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688)
Event Date 01/23/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Height: 84 cm.Investigation.Visual inspection: no significant deformations or damage of the valve was detected during the visual inspection.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that the valve is permeable.Adjustment test: in order to verify the presumed "non-adjustability", we tried to adjust the valve to all pressure levels, both upwards and downwards.The adjustment test has shown that the progav 2.0 is adjustable.Braking force and brake function test: the investigation of the braking force of the progav 2.0 valve showed the brake functions fully operational and the braking force is within the given tolerances.Results: first, we performed a visual inspection of the valve.No significant deformations or damages of the valve were detected during the visual inspection.Further, we tested the permeability of the progav 2.0.The test has shown that the valve was permeable.The suspected occlusion cannot be confirmed.In order to verify the presumed "non-adjustability", we tried to adjust the valve to all pressure levels, both upwards and downwards.The test has shown that the valve is adjustable to all pressure ranges.We then measured the braking function and the braking force.With the help of the brake force meter, the function of the brake on the progav 2.0 could be proven without any problems.The braking force of 550 g was also within the specification.In order to verify whether the valve examined here possibly was influenced by the known risks of hydrocephalus therapy, such as natural substances in the cerebrospinal fluid (protein, blood or tissue particles), we finally opened the valve.Based on our investigation, we are unable to substantiate the claim of occlusion or non-adjustability.The progav 2.0 operates within the specified tolerances and is adjustable to all settings as specified.However, we suspect that the deposits found inside the valve could have temporarily impaired the function.Deposits due to natural substances in the cerebrospinal fluid, e.G.Protein, blood or tissue particles are among the known and inevitable risks of hydrocephalic therapy.Nevertheless, we can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke (b)(4).Further actions: no further actions are required in our point of view.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a valve is not able to be adjusted.The reporter indicated that a 7 month 7 day post-operative valve has a blockage and adjustment is not possible.The device was explanted.Additional event details were not provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV 2.0 VALVE
Type of Device
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO. KG
2 ulanenweg
potsdam d, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO. KG
2 ulanenweg
potsdam d, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
2 ulanenweg
potsdam d, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key9728509
MDR Text Key188412172
Report Number3004721439-2020-00043
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JXG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K141687
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/19/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/19/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/23/2024
Device Model NumberFX410T
Device Catalogue NumberFX410T
Device Lot Number20041661
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/27/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/27/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/24/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age20 MO
Patient Weight10
-
-