|
|
| Model Number |
3504311M |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
09/21/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The mentor failure analysis lab has received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: tissue expander deflation.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a (b)(6) male patient underwent a skin laceration repair surgery with a mentor tissue expander 700cc device that deflated after implantation.As a result, the patient underwent explantation on an unknown date.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On 24-apr-2020, mentor completed a second investigation on the suspect medical device.Device evaluation summary: according with the information reported, the patient experienced a deflation in the tissue expander.During visual analysis of the device, a ruptured tubing was noted in the anterior view.Leak testing was performed, according with mentor procedure, and it revealed on the posterior view a tear measuring approximately 0.3 cm.Microscopic examination of the edges of the tubing revealed parallel striations that are consistent with markings made by a sharp instrument perforating silicone material.Microscopic examination of the edges of the tear was performed and the cause of the rupture could not be identified.Causes of deflation of tissue expander include but are not limited to the following events: crease fold failure, intraoperative or postoperative trauma, excessive stresses or manipulations as may occur during normal, daily routines including customary and purposeful trauma such as that which can occur during vigorous exercise, athletics, etc.As part of our quality process, the manufacturing records of this 7387526 lot number were reviewed and the manufacturing standards were met prior to the release of this lot.Each device is visually inspected during manufacturing to ensure the device meets the required specifications prior to shipment.Deflation complaint information is consistently analyzed and monitored by quality assurance to determine when further action is necessary.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On (b)(6) 2020, mentor completed the investigation on the suspect medical device.Device evaluation summary: according to the information reported, the patient experienced a rupture in the tissue expander.During visual analysis of the device, a ruptured tubing was noted in the anterior view.During the microscope examination, striations were detected on the edges of the rupture consistent with a rupture with a sharp instrument perforating silicone material.As stated in the product insert data sheet, do not allow cautery devices or sharp instruments, such as scalpels, suture needles, hypodermic needles, hemostats, adson forceps or scissors to contact the device during the implantation or other surgical procedures as this can result in rupture.The manufacturing records were reviewed, and the manufacturing criteria were met prior to the release of this lot.It should be noted that as part of our quality process, each device is visually inspected during manufacturing to ensure the device meets the required specifications prior to shipment.Complaint information will be included in complaint trending that is reviewed and monitor by quality assurance on a regular basis to determine if further action is necessary.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|