• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PRISMATIK DENTALCRAFT, INC. DREAM TAP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PRISMATIK DENTALCRAFT, INC. DREAM TAP Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn (2694)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not yet been returned.An investigation will be conducted once the sample has been returned and a supplemental report will be submitted.Wight: asked, but unknown.Date of event: asked, but unknown.Model number: not applicable.Catalog number: not applicable.Lot number: not applicable.Expiration date: not applicable.Udi number: not available.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient experienced an allergic reaction (date unknown) after wearing a dream tap device.The patient's gums were turning white and it felt like a second-degree burn.The patient later called the doctor stating, she was not sure if the dream tap device had caused the allergic reaction as she might have used some chemical to clean the device.The patient has no known allergies.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not been returned.However, the device investigation has been completed and the results are as follows: dhr results: no dhr was available for review since the device was fabricated per physician's prescription only.Erkodent review: suppliers (erkodent) reviewed the associated material lots and confirmed no manufacturing deviations or abnormalities.Lot# e2mm11307 (erkodur) was manufactured from 7/1/2019 and was assigned with 3 years expiration.Lot# e2mm11298 (erkoloc-pro) was manufactured from 5/20/2019 and was assigned with 3 years expiration.Airway management review: supplier (airway management) reviewed c of c analysis and confirmed material compositions are within specification.Stock product reviewed results no stock product was available for review since the device was fabricated per physician's prescription only.Investigation methods/results the device was not returned for investigation.Root cause: the root cause cannot be explicitly determined.Airway management confirmed the dreamtap has chromium content (20-30%) and is very possible to develop an allergic reaction in people with existing sensitivity.However, patient was reported having no known allergy in this case.The device's caution label states that "inspect the tap device prior to each use.If any parts of the device become loose or damage, return to your prescriber.Discontinue use if you observe material separation, material degradation, or damage parts.Discontinue use if you are experiencing nausea, vomiting, soreness or an allergic reaction." per "warnings and possible side effects" section from patient instruction for use sent to the patient, it contains the following statement, "allergic reaction may be encountered.Discontinue use if reaction occurs and consult prescriber." in addition, it was reported the patient cleaned the device with chemical (unknown), which was not recommended in patient instruction for use.Glidewell research team and namsa conducted a series of testing on a similar thermoformed sleep device (haley) following iso 10993 (biological evaluation of medical devices) and the device was evaluated for potential cytotoxicity, skin irritation, delayed dermal contact sensitization and oral mucosal irritation.The haley test article was thermoformed with layers of erkodent material (erkoloc-pro and erkodur).The test results were listed below and summarized in biocompatibility report for haley sleep device (rpt 9733 rev 1.0).For cytotoxicity testing, the test article extract showed no evidence of causing cell lysis or toxicity.For skin irritation, there was no erythema and no edema observed on the skin of the animals treated with the test article.For sensitization testing, the test article extracts showed no evidence of causing delayed dermal contact sensitization.The test article showed nonirritant to the oral mucosa as compared to the control article.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DREAM TAP
Type of Device
DREAM TAP
Manufacturer (Section D)
PRISMATIK DENTALCRAFT, INC.
2212 dupont drive
suite p
irvine CA 92612
MDR Report Key9735258
MDR Text Key190487606
Report Number3011649314-2020-00481
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LRK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K061732
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/06/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/20/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/19/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age77 YR
-
-