• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG ITREVIA 7 VR-T DF-1; ICD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG ITREVIA 7 VR-T DF-1; ICD Back to Search Results
Model Number 393040
Medical Device Problem Code Premature Elective Replacement Indicator (1483)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Date of Event 02/21/2020
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this device went from 84 percent battery capacity on (b)(6) 2020 to eri on (b)(6) 2020.No adverse patient events were reported.Should additional information become available, this file will be updated.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for analysis.The analysis is therefore only based on the returned device data as well as the inspection of the quality documents associated with the manufacture of this particular device.The manufacturing process for this device was re-investigated.All production steps had been performed accordingly.There was no sign of any inconsistency during the manufacturing.In a next step, the returned device data was inspected.During the inspection the clinical observation could be confirmed.Further analysis revealed an unexpected battery behavior, which led to the clinical observation.Based on the data available for analysis the root cause for that behavior was not determinable and can only be clarified by an analysis of the device itself.However, it cannot be excluded that this occurrence resulted from a defective component, which may compromise the ability of the device to deliver therapy.Biotronik has informed the health care professional about this analysis result, who decides, based on the patients individual circumstances and medical judgment, if the device will be exchanged.Should further relevant information or the device itself become available, this investigation will be updated and you will be informed accordingly.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This device was explanted and replaced on (b)(6) 2020.The device was not returned for analysis.The analysis is therefore only based on the returned device data as well as the inspection of the quality documents associated with the manufacture of this particular device.The manufacturing process for this device was re-investigated.All production steps had been performed accordingly.There was no sign of any inconsistency during the manufacturing.In a next step, the returned device data was inspected.During the inspection the clinical observation could be confirmed.Further analysis revealed an unexpected battery behavior, which led to the clinical observation.Based on the data available for analysis the root cause for that behavior was not determinable and can only be clarified by an analysis of the device itself.However, it cannot be excluded that this occurrence resulted from a defective component, which may compromise the ability of the device to deliver therapy.Biotronik has informed the health care professional about this analysis result, who decides, based on the patients individual circumstances and medical judgment, if the device will be exchanged.Should further relevant information or the device itself become available, this investigation will be updated and you will be informed accordingly.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This device was explanted and replaced on (b)(6) 2020.Prior to the analysis of the device, the quality documents accompanying the manufacturing process for this icd were re-investigated.All production steps were performed accordingly, and in particular the final acceptance test proved the device functions to be as specified.The device interrogation revealed the eos battery status, detected on (b)(6) 2020.The device was implanted for 33 months and 16 charging cycles were recorded in the devices memory.The icd was subjected to an electrical analysis.First, the eos status was removed with a technical programmer and the ability of the device to deliver therapies was verified.The anti-bradycardia pacing pulses proved to be normal and in amplitude and frequency as programmed.A fibrillation signal was applied and the device detected the fibrillation signal as specified and started the charging of a defibrillation shock.The shock was delivered, but the specified energy level was not reached.Subsequently, the current consumption of the icd was analyzed and found to be normal and as expected.However, an inconsistency between current consumption and battery voltage was noted.Therefore, the icd was opened and the inner assembly was inspected.The visual inspection of the inner assembly showed no anomalies.The measurement of the battery voltage showed a depleted battery.In a next step, the electronic module was attached to an external power supply to check the functionality of the electronic module.There was no indication of a malfunction.All therapy functions were available and worked as expected.The overall current consumption of the module was directly measured and proved to be normal.The battery was sent to the manufacturer for further analysis.The manufacturing records of the battery were inspected, documenting that the battery parameters were within specification during the battery manufacturing.No anomalies were documented during the production process, associated with this battery.The visual inspection of the battery did not reveal any external signs of damage.The voltage measurement confirmed the battery depletion and the microcalorimetry analysis showed a slightly elevated heat dissipation.At a next step, the battery was opened for destructive analysis and the inner assembly was inspected.The analysis identified damaged insulation, which led to an increased internal self-depletion and, as a result, to the clinical observation.In conclusion, analysis revealed an increased internal self-depletion within the battery that led to the clinical observation.The therapeutic functionality of the device was tested with an attached external power supply and proved to be fully functional.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ITREVIA 7 VR-T DF-1
Common Device Name
ICD
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin 12359
MDR Report Key9744785
Report Number1028232-2020-00900
Device Sequence Number13946626
Product Code LWS
UDI-Device Identifier04035479129552
UDI-Public04035479129552
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P050023
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2017
Device Explanted Year2020
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/21/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2017
Device Model Number393040
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/24/2020
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/21/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/26/2020
03/03/2020
11/04/2020
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/24/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/26/2020
03/04/2020
11/05/2020
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age76 YR
-
-