|
Reporter is a synthes employee.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2020 during the removal of screws, the dynamic hip screw (dhs) wrench t end broke off.The surgeon used the other t end and got the unknown lag screw out successfully.There were also two (2) broken unknown cortex screws which were removed successfully from the plate using the screw removal set.There was no surgical delay.Procedure outcome and patient status are unknown.Concomitant devices: unknown lag screw (part # unknown, lot # unknown, quantity # 1).Unknown cortex screws (part # unknown, lot # unknown, quantity # unknown).This report is for one dhs/dcs-wrench.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h4, h6: a review of the device history record.Device history lot part: 338.060, lot: 1001000, manufacturing site: hägendorf, release to warehouse date: 19.Dec.1997.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.H3, h6: investigation summary complaint summary: it was reported that on (b)(6) 2020, during removal of the dynamic hip screw (dhs) wrench t end broke off.The surgeon used the other t end and got the unknown lag screw out successfully.There were also broken two (2) unknown cortex screw which was removed in the plate which were successfully removed with the screw removal set.There was no surgical delay.Procedure outcome and patient status are unknown.Flow: damage.Visual inspection: the dhs/dcs-wrench (part # 338.060, lot # 1001000, mfg # 19-dec-1997) was received at us cq.The top t and the shaft were received separated from each and are not able to be put back together.The 2 sub-components are soldered together and came apart; therefore, the device is considered broken.This is consistent with the complaint description; therefore, the complaint is confirmed.Dimensional inspection: dimensional analysis was completed, the outer diameter of the shaft, is within specification.Document/specification review: the drawing was reviewed.The earliest revision of the device drawings available, these drawings according to our records are valid from 29-dec-1997.Since the device has been in the field for 22+ years of service, it can be concluded that the device functioned as intended.Conclusion: there is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.While no definitive root cause could be determined it is possible that the device encountered unintended forces.No new malfunctions were observed during the course of this investigation.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|