| Catalog Number |
03.008.007 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
02/06/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.(b)(4).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported on (b)(6) 2020 during a removal of a broken nail and revision fusion left tibio-talo-calcaneal fusion with bone graft, that a patient on follow up of previous procedure found to have broken previously implanted tornier / wright medical 611 nail (12mm x 180mm).Breakage above the proximal calcaneal screw.Revision booked, with consultant requesting dps nail removal, ria and han, as well as wright 611 removal set.Broken nail extracted, with difficulty removing proximal end of the broken nail.Window in patient tibia created in order to assist with removal.Surgeon selected han 13mm x 240mm left nail, which was checked, prior to being assembled onto aiming device.Alignment test complete prior to nail insertion in line with the surgical technique with no faults noted.On insertion of the nail, the surgeon again verified nail in correct alignment via intra op x-ray and confirmed nail to be locked into position.Surgeon elected to use two distal locking screws through nail as indicated, however on placing protection sleeve in most distal locking screw position, and drilling, found the drill to be hitting the nail, rather than targeting the screw hole.Decision made by the surgeon to recheck tightness of aiming device, and target the second most distal hole instead, with no issue found.Upon attempting to lock all remaining screw options, found again the drill to aiming at the nail, rather than screw holes.Decision made to use the freehand technique to place remaining locking screws.45 minutes delay in the surgery.The patient is well.This complaint involves six (6) devices.This is 1 of 6 for report (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h4, h6: a review of the device history record.Device history lot part: 03.008.007, lot: 5l05166, manufacturing site: haegendorf, release to warehouse date: 06.Sep.2019.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.H3, h6: investigation summary the returned insert-handle was forwarded to the manufacturing side for evaluation.The statement below is a summary of their investigation.Shipped back device ¿insert-handle f/expert han¿ 03.008.007 with lot number 5l05166 is in used conditions.Many scratches are present all over the surface of the device.Furthermore, all the etched symbols and numbers are present according to the drawing.They are all clearly legible but slightly faded.The following functional tests were performed on ¿insert-handle f/expert han¿ 03.008.007 with lot number 5l05166 according to inspection sheet.Functional test: position and straightness.The test was performed using functional gauge.The device passed the test confirming the absence of position and straightness issue on the internal bore; functional test on the internal thread was performed using functional gauge ¿gewinde-grenzlehrdorn¿ (thread limit plug gauge).The device passed the test performed; dimensions and positions were measured according to prüfplan.All the features resulted inside the specifications, therefore, the test was passed.Since the device ¿insert-handle f/expert han¿ 03.008.007 with lot number 5l05166 passed all the tests related to dimensions and positions and the functional test on the straightness of the bore, is not possible to replicate the complaint.The following documents were reviewed: ¿ device history record (dhr) 16636579; ¿ inspection sheet se_191271 version ah, ¿pa intern multiple 03.008.007¿; ¿ drawing 03_008_007_, ¿insertion handle¿.In order to perform the investigation, all the documents mentioned above, valid when the device was manufactured, have been analyzed.The manufacturing process was executed according to the analyzed documents and no anomalies were identified.According to evidences is not possible to address the final root cause to a manufacturing issue.The manufacturing process was performed according to the reviewed documents and all functional test were recorded.Most likely a mishandling of the device could have led to the opening of this complaint.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed as no product related issue could be detected.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
4/27/2020: updated event description: this complaint involves seven (7) devices.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This complaint involves six (6) devices.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|