|
|
| Model Number |
170-03-35018 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Stenosis (2263)
|
| Date of Event |
11/19/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The stent remains implanted in patient and delivery system is presumed discarded since the event occurred approximately three months after index procedure.The lot history record (lhr) review revealed no non-conformances related to the reported adverse event.The devices from this lot conforms to its predetermined specifications and requirements.Restenosis is captured in the risk assessment as a known potential hazards and listed in the instructions for use as a known potential adverse event.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with additional relevant information.The other cobra pzf stents referenced are reported under separate manufacturer report numbers.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
An (b)(6) year-old male with medical history coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus type ii, hypertension, dyslipidemia, prior coronary artery bypass graft (cabg) in 2018, prior percutaneous coronary intervention (pci) in 2008, and atrial fibrillation presented with stable angina.The patient enrolled in cobra trial on 12 august 2019.Angiography showed a significant lesion in the proximal left anterior circumflex (lcx) coronary artery.Pci was performed, without pre-dilation, via deployment of four cobra pzf¿ nanocoated stents (3 each of 3.5x15mm size, and 3.5x18mm), followed by post-dilatation.The procedure was concluded without issue and the patient was discharged the following day.Starting (b)(6) 2019, patient was feeling intermittent chest pain for a week, radiating down left arm even at rest.Patient visited cardiologist who sent them to the hospital due to ekg changes: st depressions v2-v4.Eliquis was held for an angiogram which resulted in stenosis in the left main and proximal lcx.Drug eluting stents were implanted into the left main and plcx where the previous cobra stent was implanted.The patient was loaded with 600mg plavix upon arrival to the hospital.Patient stabilized and discharged home on (b)(6) 2019 and was instructed to restart eliquis and continue with aspirin/plavix for about 1 month before indefinitely continuing with eliquis 5mg twice daily and plavix 75mg daily.Per the investigator, the event was not related to the study procedure, but possibly related to the study device.The sponsor agrees.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H2 additional information: b5 revised.H6 revised.Stent remains implanted in patient.As event occurred approximately 5 years after index procedure and there were no reported device malfunctions, the delivery system presumed discarded and not requested.A review of the lot history record (lhr) revealed no non-conformances related to the reported adverse event.The devices from this lot conforms to its predetermined specifications and requirements.The investigator reported that the event is not related to the index procedure, but definitely related to the study device.Per the sponsor, the most likely root cause of restenosis is disease progression.Intracoronary stent restenosis is multifactorial (including, but not limited to, patient lesion type, disease progression, comorbidities, and vessel trauma during the index procedure).Restenosis can also result from malapposition of the stent/sub-optimal stent expansion (stent unable to maintain intended patency, loss of strength due to fracture, position of stent compromised, use error of incorrect deployment, smaller deployed diameter).Relationship between restenosis and study device cannot be completely excluded.The identification of restenosis at the site of the treated lesion does not imply a technical problem with the study device or study procedure.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling; there is no evidence of a device deficiency.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A 71-year-old male with medical history coronary artery disease with prior percutaneous coronary intervention (pci) in 2008, prior coronary artery bypass graft (cabg) in 2018, aortic stenosis with porcine aortic valve replacement (feb 2018), atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus type ii, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and skin cancer.Presented with stable angina on (b)(6) 2019.The patient enrolled in cobra trial.Angiography on (b)(6) 2019 showed a significant lesion in the proximal left anterior circumflex (lcx) coronary artery.Pci was performed, without pre-dilation, via deployment of four cobra pzf¿ nanocoated stents (3 each of 3.5x15mm size, and 3.5x18mm), followed by post-dilatation.The procedure was concluded without issue and the patient was discharged the following day.Starting on (b)(6) 2019, patient was feeling intermittent chest pain at rest for a week, radiating to left arm.The patient had ekg changes: st depressions v2-v4 and elevated cardiac enzymes; non-st-elevated myocardial infarction (nstemi) was diagnosed.Eliquis was held for an angiogram which resulted in 80% stenosis in the left main and 90% restenosis in proximal lcx (type c lesion).Drug eluting stents were implanted into the left main and plcx where the previous cobra stent was implanted.The patient was loaded with 600mg plavix upon arrival to the hospital.Patient stabilized and discharged home on (b)(6) 2019 and was instructed to restart eliquis and continue with aspirin/plavix for about 1 month before indefinitely continuing with eliquis 5mg twice daily and plavix 75mg daily.Per the investigator, the event was not related to the study procedure, but possibly related to the study device.The sponsor agrees.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|