|
Batch review performed on 07 february 2020: lot 186210: (b)(4) items manufactured and released on 02-oct-2018.Expiration date: 2023-09-20.No anomalies found related to the problem.To date, (b)(4) items of the same lot have been already sold without any other similar reported event.Patient match planning review performed by medacta mysolution: primary c_mar_rsk_gm_26051959.We analyzed each step of the myknee process; no errors have been found.Here below you can find the detailed analysis of the process: images qc: the dataset fully respects the protocol.The images were not expired at the time of the surgery.Reconstruction: the reconstructed profile follows precisely the contour of the bone.Planning - landmarks: all the landmarks were taken accordingly to the process.Pre-op information: as per the other cases, the only information available to the my knee team was about the bones.No pre-op information was available regarding: the status of the ligaments: this information, as for all the cases, is available just to the surgeon.The thickness of the cartilage: this information is not available, since this case is ct- based.Planning proposal: in the planning proposal, all the chosen parameters are within the range of preferences set by the surgeon on the website.Planning - validation: our planning proposal has been validated by the surgeon, without any changes in the parameters.Planning- choice of the size: we proposed a size 5 for the femur and a size 5 for the tibia.The surgeon implanted the chosen size on the femur, while he implanted a size 4 on the tibia.Femoral cutting block: all the pads are in contact with parts that cannot get detached.Tibial cutting block: all the pads are in contact with parts that cannot get detached.Femoral implant positioning: the prosthesis would fit with the parameters of the validated revision.Tibial implant positioning: the prosthesis would fit with the parameters of the validated revision.Extra-analysis: no extra-analysis is possible, since we have not received any x-ray.Conclusions: our analysis of the myknee process of this case found no deviations from the standard procedures.Each step has been performed correctly.Revision c_mar_rsk_jm_26051959: we analyzed each step of the myknee process; no errors have been found.Here below you can find the detailed analysis of the process: images qc: the dataset fully respects the protocol.The images were not expired at the time of the surgery.Reconstruction: the reconstructed profile follows precisely the contour of the bone and relative implant.Planning - landmarks: all the landmarks were taken accordingly to the process pre-op information: as per the other cases, the only information available to the my knee team was about the bones.No pre-op information was available regarding: the status of the ligaments: this information, as for all the cases, is available just to the surgeon.The thickness of the cartilage: this information is not available, since this case is ct- based.Planning proposal: this is a post-op revision case, therefore no myknee cutting blocks has been produced.For this cases we perform only a planning evaluation.Extra-analysis: no extra-analysis is possible, since we have not received any x-ray conclusions: our analysis of the myknee process of this case found no deviations from the standard procedures.Each step has been performed correctly.
|