|
The associated device, used in treatment, was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device confirmed the stated failure mode.The tip of the post on the device fractured off and was returned.The device was manufactured in 2007 and shows signs of extensive wear.The medical investigation concluded that, without information regarding the patient¿s medical history, bone quality, radiographic images or operative reports, the root cause of the instability could not be concluded.The surgeon¿s intraoperative findings of the articulating insert separation from the base cannot be ruled out as a contributing factor.This event occurred 12 years post implant and the replacement insert was 6mm thicker indicating increasing joint laxity.It is unknown if this also played a role in the disassociation and/or breakage of the insert.The impact to the patient beyond the revision cannot be determined.Should any additional medical information be provided this complaint would be re-assessed.The knee insert post deformation and/or fracture may have been due to repeated posterior contact of the femoral cam on the post combined with excessive posterior to anterior shear force during activity.However, this could not be isolated as the root cause for this particular failure mode.A review of complaint history did not reveal additional complaints for the listed batch.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do not have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use documents revealed this failure mode was previously identified.Some potential probable causes for this event could include a sizing issue, overuse or a traumatic injury.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|