• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 209999
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 02/06/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
As part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplement al report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
 
Event Description
This pi is for patient 1 of 3.(b)(6) yo male, surgery (b)(6) 201 9.As reported by surgeon: attached are xrays of three patients i previously discussed.All have concerning radiolucencies underneath the tibial baseplate that appeared several months post op.Thus far, none have required revision but all have some degree of pain (mostly medial).Again i never saw this prior the mics transition.Let me know your thoughts and if any other surgeons have seen this issue.More recently, i have been using a 2mm drill to perforate the sclerotic tibial surface to promote better cement interdigitation and my results seem to be much better.Case type: pka 3.0.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Update to d2.Reported event: it was reported ¿this pi is for patient 1 of 3.As reported by surgeon: attached are xrays of three patients i previously discussed.All have concerning radiolucencies underneath the tibial baseplate that appeared several months post op.Thus far, none have required revision but all have some degree of pain (mostly medial).Again i never saw this prior the mics transition.Let me know your thoughts and if any other surgeons have seen this issue.More recently, i have been using a 2mm drill to perforate the sclerotic tibial surface to promote better cement interdigitation and my results seem to be much better.Case type: pka 3.0.¿ method & results: product evaluation and results: a review of the case logs did not find anything that would suggest issue with the robotic system.The patient plan and resection visuals did not show anything out of the ordinary.All accuracy values for bone registration were acceptable and the registration pattern was properly taken.Product history review: a review of device history records shows that (b)(6) was inspected on (b)(6) 2009 and was handled via npr.A review of the data revealed that the non-conformances is not related to the failure alleged in this complaint.Complaint history review: a search of the complaint database under device identification pn: 209999 reports no similar complaints for pka software, other.Conclusions: the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.A review of the case logs did not find anything that would suggest issue with the robotic system.The patient plan and resection visuals did not show anything out of the ordinary.All accuracy values for bone registration were acceptable and the registration pattern was properly taken.No additional investigation or specific actions are required at this time.If additional information is received, then the complaint will be reopened.System is ready for use.
 
Event Description
This pi is for patient 1 of 3.As reported by surgeon: attached are xrays of three patients i previously discussed.All have concerning radiolucence es underneath the tibial baseplate that appeared several months post op.Thus far, none have required revision but all have some degree of pain (mostly medial).Again i never saw this prior the mics transition.Let me know your thoughts and if any other surgeons have seen this issue.More recently, i have been using a 2mm drill to perforate the sclerotic tibial surface to promote better cement interdigitation n and my results seem to be much better.Case type: pka 3.0.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3.0 RIO ROBOTIC ARM - MICS
Type of Device
ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
MDR Report Key9779802
MDR Text Key181843065
Report Number3005985723-2020-00124
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
UDI-Device Identifier00848486030407
UDI-Public00848486030407
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/15/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/03/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number209999
Device Catalogue Number209999
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/23/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age72 YR
-
-