• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 SEPRAMESH IP; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 SEPRAMESH IP; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5959124
Medical Device Problem Codes Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Abscess (1690); Adhesion(s) (1695); Fistula (1862); Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Injury (2348); Disability (2371)
Date of Event 12/11/2018
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol sepramesh composite ip on (b)(6) 2015.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the sepramesh composite ip.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-sep-2013) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d3, d4 (catalog no, lot no, udi, expiry date), d.6b (date of explant), g3, g4, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol sepramesh composite ip on (b)(6) 2015.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the sepramesh composite ip.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2015 - patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia with bowel incarceration thereby underwent open repair with the implant of sepramesh ip (device #1).Per op notes, "a sepramesh ip was placed to the abdomen using prolene sutures." (b)(6) 2018 - patient was diagnosed with abdominal wall abscess with enterocutaneous fistula and abdominal wall mesh infection thereby underwent repair with removal of mesh.Per op notes, "the mesh was barely adherent to the surrounding tissue.The mesh was removed." (b)(6) 2019 - patient was diagnosed with enterocutaneous fistula thereby underwent takedown of enterocutaneous fistula, small bowel resection and incisional hernia repair.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SEPRAMESH IP
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258495
MDR Report Key9792016
Report Number1213643-2020-02047
Device Sequence Number2330605
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741031793
UDI-Public(01)00801741031793(17)150928(10)HUXI1071
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateRI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K063739
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2015
Device Explanted Year2018
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/18/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/28/2015
Device Catalogue Number5959124
Device Lot NumberHUXI1071
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/19/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/27/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/05/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/18/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/15/2013
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Disability; Required Intervention;
Patient Age60 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-