MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MCK TIBIAL BASEPLATE-RM/LL-SZ 6; PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM

Model Number	180616
Medical Device Problem Code	Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Code	Pain (1994)
Date of Event	02/06/2020
Type of Reportable Event	Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
An event regarding pain involving a mako baseplate was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device remained implanted medical records received and evaluation: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant stated the following comment: cannot confirm event, need additional information; primary and revision operative reports, clinical and past medical history, additional serial dated x-rays and examination of explanted components.Product history review: a review of the device manufacturing records indicate that all devices accepted into final stock were free from discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Further information such as primary operative reports, clinical and past medical history, additional serial dated x-rays and examination of explanted components are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and / or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
Event or Problem Description
This pi is for the implants used in patient 3 of 3.(b)(6) male, surgery (b)(6) 2019.Right knee.As reported by surgeon: attached are xrays of three patients i previously discussed.All have concerning radiolucencies underneath the tibial baseplate that appeared several months post op.Thus far, none have required revision but all have some degree of pain (mostly medial).Again i never saw this prior the mics transition.Let me know your thoughts and if any other surgeons have seen this issue.More recently, i have been using a 2mm drill to perforate the sclerotic tibial surface to promote better cement interdigitation and my results seem to be much better.Case type: pka 3.0.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event an event regarding pain involving a mako baseplate was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results -product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device remained implanted.-medical records received and evaluation: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant stated the following comment: cannot confirm event, need additional information; primary and revision operative reports, clinical and past medical history, additional serial dated x-rays and examination of explanted components.-product history review: a review of the device manufacturing records indicate that all devices accepted into final stock were free from discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Further information such as primary operative reports, clinical and past medical history, additional serial dated x-rays and examination of explanted components are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and / or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.Product surveillance will continue to monitor for trends.Corrective action/preventive action: no action is required at this time as there is no indication to suggest a product nonconformity or unanticipated hazard.H3 other text : device not returned.
Event or Problem Description
This pi is for the implants used in patient 3 of 3.55 yo male, surgery(b)(6)2019.Right knee.As reported by surgeon: attached are xrays of three patients i previously discussed.All have concerning radiolucencies underneath the tibial baseplate that appeared several months post op.Thus far, none have required revision but all have some degree of pain (mostly medial).Again i never saw this prior the mics transition.Let me know your thoughts and if any other surgeons have seen this issue.More recently, i have been using a 2mm drill to perforate the sclerotic tibial surface to promote better cement interdigitation and my results seem to be much better.Case type: pka 3.0.

• Brand Name: MCK TIBIAL BASEPLATE-RM/LL-SZ 6
• Common Device Name: PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM
• Manufacturer (Section D): MAKO SURGICAL CORP.; 2555 davie road; fort lauderdale FL 33317
• MDR Report Key: 9794039
• Report Number: 3005985723-2020-00140
• Device Sequence Number: 14096781
• Product Code: NPJ
• UDI-Device Identifier: 00848486000790
• UDI-Public: 00848486000790
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: WA
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: K090763
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Device Implanted Year: 2019
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: health professional,other
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Physician
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 04/06/2020

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Model Number: 180616
• Device Catalogue Number: 180616
• Device Lot Number: 26100518-01
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 02/06/2020
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: 03/11/2020
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 03/05/2020
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 04/06/2020
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event: Other
• Patient Age: 55 YR