Device Problem
Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524)
|
Patient Problem
Pain (1994)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
According to the available information, the patient had laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for recurrent vaginal prolapse and a non-coloplast tvt for stress incontinence in 2016.The patient had left sided pelvic pain and pain on intercourse.Examination under anaesthesia + cystoscopy were performed to investigate the pain.The findings were 3 cms mesh extrusion into vagina, no mesh extrusion of tvt noted, and cystoscopic examination- normal.The patient was made aware and was referred to tertiary centre.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This follow-up mdr is created to document the patient sex and conclusion of the investigation.No components were received for evaluation.As examination of the components may not conclusively confirm or disprove the report of extrusion quality accepts the physician's observations as to the reason for surgical intervention.As no lot # was provided, a review of the device history record, complaint history database, nonconformances and capas could not be completed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|