| Model Number |
N/A |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Leak/Splash (1354)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Blood Loss (2597)
|
| Date of Event |
12/04/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Implanted date: device was not implanted.Explanted date: device was not explanted.The actual device has been returned for evaluation.The investigation is currently ongoing.A follow up report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.A review of the device history record of the product code/lot# combination was conducted with no findings.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Terumo medical received a user facility medwatch report # (b)(4).The event description states: "introducer sheath arterial dilators - blood poured out of hemostasis valve - explanted and replaced.Tavr procedure successfully performed.Patient to icu in stable condition.9 fr sheath placed in patient's body.Once the dilator for the sheath was removed, we realized the diaphragm for the sheath was broken and arterial blood was squirting out the sheath.We replaced the whole sheath with another 9 fr sheath, and it started leaking as well, but not quite as bad.The device failed.The device did not do what is was supposed to do." additional information was received on 20february2020: the second device (terumo pinnacle introducer sheath fr.) was utilized - replacing the first device (explanted).The second was how they completed the procedure.The estimated blood loss was estimated to be 50cc's.The patient was brought to the hybrid operating room and after suitable conscious sedation was obtained the patient was prepped and draped in a sterile manner.A right femoral arterial sheath was placed.The left femoral arterial and venous sheath were placed.The pacemaker lead was advanced into the right ventricular apex under fluoroscopic guidance through the left femoral venous sheath.Then through the right femoral arterial sheath the edwards deployment device containing a edwards 23 mm sapien 3 valve was advanced under careful fluoroscopic guidance up into the aortic arch and down into the ascending aorta across the aortic valve.Cine angiography confirmed appropriate placement.Rapid sequence pacing was then undertaken to induce hypotension and the transcatheter aortic valve was insufflated partially with repeat cineangiography insuring proper placement.The valve was then fully deployed.Rapid sequence pacing was terminated, the balloon was deflated and the transcatheter deployment device was withdrawn back across the aortic valve into the ascending aorta.Trans-thoracic echo confirmed satisfactory placement of prosthetic valve with trace aortic regurgitation.Angiography demonstrated no impairment of left main coronary flow.The patient's hemodynamics were satisfactory.The deployment device was then withdrawn along with other catheters and wires.The right femoral artery sheath was fully removed, and hemostasis achieved with a perclose device.Likewise, the left femoral artery sheath was withdrawn, and hemostasis obtained.The femoral venous sheaths were also withdrawn with good hemostasis.The patient was returned to the intensive care unit in stable condition.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted as follow up no.1 to update the h3 section and to provide the completed investigation results.One 9fr introducer sheath and the dilator were received for product evaluation.During decontamination of the sheath and dilator, the dilator could not be removed from the sheath.It was noted that the valve had dislodged from the sheath and was been pushed down the sheath shaft while the dilator was mated to the sheath, causing the dilator to be stuck inside the sheath.With great force, the dilator was removed from the sheath.The valve could be seen at the tip of the sheath nested inside the shaft.The valve was removed by reinserting the dilator inside the sheath; the valve came out of the sheath distal tip.To check for damage at the crosscut valve, the valve was dissected and observed under microscope.Damage was observed at the center of the crosscut valve.The valve was also deformed into an oval shape, likely because the valve was dislodged from the hub and pushed down into the sheath shaft.Based on the provided information and investigation results there is no evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction.Based on the investigation results, it is likely that the dilator was inserted off-center into the hub, dislodging the valve from its intended orientation.However, the exact cause of the reported event cannot be determined based on the available information.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|