• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. DENALI FEMORAL SYSTEM; VENA CAVA FILTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. DENALI FEMORAL SYSTEM; VENA CAVA FILTER Back to Search Results
Model Number DL900F
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Malposition of Device (2616); Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem Abdominal Pain (1685)
Event Date 08/10/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: a lot history review was performed.This is the only complaint to date for this lot number.Therefore, a device history record (dhr) review is not required.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Approximately two years post filter deployment, patient presented for filter retrieval due to filter fracture and fractured strut embolized in pulmonary artery.Venogram through the sheath demonstrates the medial aspect of the ivc filter embedded within the wall of the ivc.A gooseneck snare was then advanced through the retrieval sheath and was unable to snare the hook of the filter.An 8 mm vertebral catheter was attempted to snare the hook and were unsuccessful.Forceps were also used to attempt to snare the hook and were unsuccessful.Subsequently, a sos catheter was used to direct a wire through the tines and directed cephalad.This wire was then snared and pulled out through the existing sheath.The sheath was unable to be advanced over the hook.Two of the tines became deformed and were directed cephalad.Repeat attempts were made at snaring the ivc filter and were unsuccessful including with use of a steerable 7 french sheath and a pigtail catheter.The remaining caudally directed tines of the filter and the hook could not be engaged.Approximately one month later, multiple attempts were made to remove the ivc filter without success.The filter could be grasped near the hook.The 2 legs which had been flipped superiorly were able to be looped, however, the snare could not be passed through the right groin sheath.A final attempt was made to snare the hook of the filter from the right ij access using a gooseneck snare.The course narrowed and the 16 french sheaths was advanced in order to collapsed filter, remove it from the wall and then pulled through the sheath from the neck.The migrated strut was unchanged in position within the right lower lobe pulmonary artery.The strut was able to be grasped with the gooseneck snare and pulled within the vertebral catheter which was then removed from the right groin.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for material deformation, filter limb detachment and retrieval difficulties.However, the investigation is inconclusive for perforation of the ivc and filter tilt.Per medical records, multiple attempts were made to engage the hook of the filter using snare, sheath and forceps but were unsuccessful due to embedment.This could have contributed to the retrieval difficulties.However, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.(expiry date: 08/2018), (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient after being diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism.At some time post filter deployment, it was alleged that the filter tilted, strut detached and perforated into the organs.The device and detached strut were removed percutaneously after an attempted but unsuccessful percutaneous removal procedure.It was further reported that the detached strut migrated to the right lower lobe pulmonary artery was successfully retrieved during second removal procedure.The patient reportedly experienced abdominal and right-side body pain; however, the current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DENALI FEMORAL SYSTEM
Type of Device
VENA CAVA FILTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer Contact
judith ludwig
1415 w. 3rd street
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key9810400
MDR Text Key182786054
Report Number2020394-2020-01387
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
UDI-Device Identifier00801741040801
UDI-Public(01)00801741040801
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K130366
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/10/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/10/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberDL900F
Device Catalogue NumberDL900F
Device Lot NumberGFZG3081
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/12/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age51 YR
-
-