MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

Model Number 9600TFX23J

Device Problems Failure to Conduct (1114); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)

Patient Problems Arrhythmia (1721); Failure of Implant (1924)

Event Date 07/18/2019

Event Type  Injury  

Manufacturer Narrative

Per the instructions for use (ifu), conduction system defects (heart block) which may require a permanent pacemaker are potential adverse events associated with balloon aortic valvuloplasty, deployment of the prosthetic valve, and the overall tavr procedure.According to the valve academic research consortium (varc) guidelines, the close anatomical relationship between the aortic valve complex and the branching atrioventricular bundle may provide an explanation for these complications of the tavr procedure.According to literature review, and as documented in a clinical technical summary written by edwards lifesciences, atrioventricular conduction disturbances after tavr are associated with many patient related and procedural related factors, including pre-operative co-morbid status, the degree and bulkiness of aortic valve and annular calcification, inter-ventricular septal thickness, pre-existing electrocardiogram abnormalities, the depth of prosthesis implantation, and the profile of the implanted prosthesis.Unlike conventional avr, where there may be localized trauma due to decalcification of the annulus and/or suture placement in the proximity of the av node or the bundles, tavr may cause conduction abnormalities through mechanical impingement of the conduction system by the prosthesis.The mechanisms of the development of heart block after tavr are well documented and described in the literature.It is also documented that pre-existing heart block is common in patients undergoing tavr or surgical avr and another 4-6 % will develop postoperative heart block, potentially requiring a permanent pacemaker.In this case, there was no allegation or indication a device malfunction contributed to this adverse event.The exact cause of the conduction disorder is unknown but may be related to the mechanisms described above.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required at this time.

Event Description

As reported through the (b)(6) case registry, a 23 mm sapien 3 valve was implanted in aortic annulus via transfemoral approach.On the same day of the procedure, severe conduction disorder occurred.On postoperative day (pod) 4, leadless pacemaker was implanted and the outcome was determined as remission.Per the medical opinion, the relation of the event to the device was affirmed.The relation of the event to the procedure was denied.Seriousness was determined as serious.

Manufacturer Narrative

Reference capa-20-00141.

• Brand Name: EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
• Type of Device: AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
• Manufacturer (Section D): EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES; 1 edwards way; irvine CA 92614
• MDR Report Key: 9819401
• MDR Text Key: 191108014
• Report Number: 2015691-2020-10886
• Device Sequence Number: 1
• Product Code: NPT
• Combination Product (y/n): N
• PMA/PMN Number: P140031
• Number of Events Reported: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Report Source: Manufacturer
• Source Type: company representative,foreig
• Remedial Action: Other
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup
• Report Date: 02/19/2020

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Device Operator: Health Professional
• Device Expiration Date: 11/01/2020
• Device Model Number: 9600TFX23J
• Device Lot Number: 6312889
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Initial Date Manufacturer Received: 02/19/2020
• Initial Date FDA Received: 03/11/2020
• Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received: 07/23/2020
• Supplement Dates FDA Received: 10/04/2020
• Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device?: No
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Patient Outcome(s): Required Intervention
• Patient Age: 93 YR