MEDPLAST MEDICAL, INC. REZUM; UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL ENDOSCOPIC (WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORIES)
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number D2201 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Urinary Retention (2119)
|
Event Date 01/09/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that, via a social media blog, a patient reported to have undergone a rezum prostate therapy procedure on (b)(6) 2020.The patient stated that the doctor put in a catheter and a urine holding bag; after one week it was taken out, however, the patient still could not urinate on his own.The physician put a catheter back for another week but the urination issue continued.The physician catheterized the patient again, this time for two weeks.The patient reported having seen the physician on (b)(6) 2020.The patient reported that the physician wants to rasp prostate tissue and patient is reluctant to get this done.The patient also reported that he is reverting back to the original problem and is passing a bit of urine in bed at night.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The product was not returned so no physical analysis could be performed.A review of the ifu and operators manual was completed and did not reveal any evidence of device misuse, off-label use, or failure to follow instructions.The potential cause(s) and controls for complaints related to the clinical event were identified.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, the most probable cause for this complaint was considered known inherent risk of device.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that, via a social media blog, a patient reported to have undergone a rezum prostate therapy procedure on (b)(6) 2020.The patient stated that the doctor put in a catheter and a urine holding bag; after one week it was taken out, however, the patient still could not urinate on his own.The physician put a catheter back for another week but the urination issue continued.The physician catheterized the patient again, this time for two weeks.The patient reported having seen the physician on 12feb2020.The patient reported that the physician wants to rasp prostate tissue and patient is reluctant to get this done.The patient also reported that he is reverting back to the original problem and is passing a bit of urine in bed at night.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Evaluation conclusion code: corrected.The product was not returned so no physical analysis could be performed.A review of the ifu and operators manual was completed and did not reveal any evidence of device misuse, off-label use, or failure to follow instructions.The potential cause(s) and controls for complaints related to the clinical event were identified.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, the most probable cause for this complaint was considered known inherent risk of device.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that, via a social media blog, a patient reported to have undergone a rezum prostate therapy procedure on (b)(6) 2020.The patient stated that the doctor put in a catheter and a urine holding bag; after one week it was taken out, however, the patient still could not urinate on his own.The physician put a catheter back for another week but the urination issue continued.The physician catheterized the patient again, this time for two weeks.The patient reported having seen the physician on (b)(6) 2020.The patient reported that the physician wants to rasp prostate tissue and patient is reluctant to get this done.The patient also reported that he is reverting back to the original problem and is passing a bit of urine in bed at night.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|