• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 209999
Device Problems Loss of Osseointegration (2408); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Loss of Range of Motion (2032); Injury (2348); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
Event Date 02/19/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
As part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
 
Event Description
This pi is for the robot used in the primary procedure.As reported in (b)(4): "doctor revised a triathlon pa beaded femoral component size 3 to a cemented size 2 primary cr femur.He also swapped the tibial insert.He did this due to patient stiffness.He said the implant wasn't grossly loose, but noted the distal and posterior interface was mostly fibrous ingrowth.He did note the original x-ray, it looked like the femur may have been flexed slightly relative to the cuts which caused a slight gap in certain areas.Right knee." rep provided primary and revision usage sheets and reported that no further information will be released by the hospital or surgeon.
 
Event Description
This pi is for the robot used in the primary procedure.As reported in (b)(4): "doctor revised a triathlon pa beaded femoral component size 3 to a cemented size 2 primary cr femur.He also swapped the tibial insert.He did this due to patient stiffness.He said the implant wasn't grossly loose, but noted the distal and posterior interface was mostly fibrous ingrowth.He did note the original x-ray, it looked like the femur may have been flexed slightly relative to the cuts which caused a slight gap in certain areas.Right knee." rep provided primary and revision usage sheets and reported that no further information will be released by the hospital or surgeon.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding rom and loosening involving a mako tka case was reported.The event was not confirmed.It was reported that ¿this pi is for the robot used in the primary procedure.As reported in (b)(4): "dr.Revised a triathlon pa beaded femoral component size 3 to a cemented size 2 primary cr femur.He also swapped the tibial insert.He did this due to patient stiffness.He said the implant wasn't grossly loose, but noted the distal and posterior interface was mostly fibrous ingrowth.He did note the original x-ray, it looked like the femur may have been flexed slightly relative to the cuts which caused a slight gap in certain areas.Right knee." rep provided primary and revision usage sheets and reported that no further information will be released by the hospital or surgeon.¿ product evaluation and results: review of the case session files was not performed as case session data was not provided.Clinician review was not performed as no medical records were received for review with a clinical consultant.Product history review: review of the device history records associated with (b)(6) indicate that on 29/nov/2010 quality inspection procedures were completed with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: a search of the complaint database under device identification pn: 209999, (b)(6) reports no similar complaints for tka software inaccurate resection.Conclusions: the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Further information such as return of the case session data, pre and post-operative x-rays, as well as patient history and follow-up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause no additional investigation or specific actions are required.If additional information is received then the complaint will be reopened.H3 other text : device not returned.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3.0 RIO ROBOTIC ARM - MICS
Type of Device
ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
MDR Report Key9837064
MDR Text Key183772342
Report Number3005985723-2020-00159
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
UDI-Device Identifier00848486030407
UDI-Public00848486030407
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/20/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/16/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator No Information
Device Model Number209999
Device Catalogue Number209999
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/24/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age68 YR
-
-