• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER/HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP STRYKER METAL-ON-METAL HIP IMPLANT; PROSTHESIS, HIP, HEMI-FEMORAL, METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER/HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP STRYKER METAL-ON-METAL HIP IMPLANT; PROSTHESIS, HIP, HEMI-FEMORAL, METAL Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Swelling (2091); Thrombus (2101); Tissue Damage (2104)
Event Date 07/01/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Dr.(b)(6) replaced ball and socket components, originally placed in (b)(6) 2008.Right hip.Dr.(b)(6) stated that the sciatic nerve had been traumatized during the extended procedure to clear the damaged tissue and took over two hours longer.The right foot did not respond to physical therapy in the hospital, so i was released with an afo brace.Further testing and continued disability caused the dr.To reattack the damaged right hip from the rear on (b)(6) 2019.During this procedure scar tissue was removed from the sheath on the nerve manually through the 8 inch incision.Electric stimulation of the nerve caused toes to move.Still treatment for lower extremity blood clots and foot swelling continue into the sixth month, with minor improvement.
 
Event Description
Add'l info received on 03/23/2020 from reporter for report mw5093848.Gentlemen: the items are my wife's request for a class 1 recall of stryker metal-on-metal hip head ball components.Included are her personal notes, dr (b)(6) surgical reports (3), dr.(b)(6) pre-surgical comment, lab reports from (b)(6) 2019 - (b)(6)2019, and her fda form 3500 submission.The fda was being asked to start the recall class 1, for the sake of other patients who might have the same corrosion caused metallosis.A report on (b)(6) and a market publication of november 2014 show that over a billion dollars in federal court ((b)(6)) have been paid by stryker for similar hip components, yet our doctor has not been notified of the recall.To date, (b)(6), has been unable to use her right foot.After the (b)(6) surgeries, with charges submitted to (b)(6) and (b)(6) - for- life, the government asked the cause.We responded that it was metal corrosion from a stryker hip replacement of (b)(6) 2008.We were instructed to wait upon the u.S.Treasury being made whole, before submitting our claim.Now, approaching nine months, requiring 24/7 care, we have asked the fda for the recall.Expecting that stryker would respond quickly to the government, we borrowed against our personal retirement accounts, for a used vehicle, and other disability support items.Fast forward into 2020, no response from our (b)(6) attorney cause us to make the following: declare the class 1 recall; settle the current u.S.Government claims, and future claims related to it; consider how stryker corporation might replace our common stock losses from our retirement accounts.(this is not a litigation, because we are directed to await the government).(coronavirus market affects all of us with our holdings).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
STRYKER METAL-ON-METAL HIP IMPLANT
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, HEMI-FEMORAL, METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER/HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP
MDR Report Key9859692
MDR Text Key184479789
Report NumberMW5093848
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Voluntary
Reporter Occupation Patient Family Member or Friend
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/30/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received03/19/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/23/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No Information
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Disability;
Patient Age79 YR
Patient Weight76
-
-