|
H10: h2, h6.The reported 4.5 bonecutter blade, intended for use in treatment, has not been returned for evaluation.Without the reported product a visual or functional evaluation cannot be performed and the customers complaint cannot be confirmed.From the information provided, the blade released particles during use.An exact root cause cannot be determined with confidence; however, factors that could have contributed to the reported event include: excessive lateral load placed on the blade during use.The instruction for use outlines precautionary statements and instructions in regards to the use of the device to avoid damage or non-functionality.A review of the manufacturing and complaint records was performed for the reported lot, there were no indications that would suggest that the device did not meet product specifications upon release into distribution.Further investigation is not warranted at this time.Conclusion: based on the limited information provided the root cause of the reported released particles could not be determined.It is unclear if the instructions foe use were adhered to; however, it does caution that ¿excessive ¿side-loading¿ on the blade during use does not improve cutting performance, and in extreme cases may result in wear and degradation of the inner blade¿.The bonecutter blade material composition (inner/outer tip blade assembly) is manufactured and intended as an externally communicating device, not approved for implantation; therefore, long-term implantation data is not available.The patient impact beyond possible corrosion, local irritation/discomfort, and/or migration of possibly retained non-implantable foreign body fragments cannot be determined.A review of relevant clinical/medical information in the reported issue, inclusive of technique and patient information, to include, but not limited to: ¿patient information ¿surgical procedure/post-operative care review ¿device labeling (including technique guides, ifus, etc.) reportedly during a hip arthroscopy the bonecutter blade released particles and it is unknown if the particles were removed from the patient.No information has been provided on how the procedure was completed.No delay or patient injuries are being reported.No clinically relevant supporting documentation was provided for inclusion in a medical investigation.Conclusion: based on the limited information provided the root cause of the reported released particles could not be determined.It is unclear if the ifu 1060816 were adhered to; however, it does caution that ¿excessive ¿side-loading¿ on the blade during use does not improve cutting performance, and in extreme cases may result in wear and degradation of the inner blade¿.The bonecutter blade material composition (inner/outer tip blade assembly) is 17-4ph and 304 sst, and is manufactured and intended as an externally communicating device, not approved for implantation; therefore, long-term implantation data is not available.The patient impact beyond possible corrosion, local irritation/discomfort, and/or migration of possibly retained non-implantable foreign body fragments cannot be determined.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.Approved by (b)(6), md (b)(6) 2020.
|