| Model Number |
M0068F64540 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Overheating of Device (1437)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
03/02/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Initial reporter city: (b)(6).(b)(4).The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation on march 2, 2020 that a lighttrail single use 600um laser fiber was used in a percutaneous nephrolithonomy (pcnl) procedure in the kidney performed on (b)(6) 2020.Reportedly, the laser unit used was an auriga xl laser console with laser settings of 3500 millijoules and 12 hertz.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the fiber connector was burning and smoke was coming out from it.Upon removal of the laser fiber it was noticed that the connector was very hot.The laser connector fell off and separated from the rest of the fiber.Reportedly, there was no burn injury to the user or to the patient.The procedure was completed with the original device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation on (b)(6) 2020 that a lighttrail single use 600um laser fiber was used in a percutaneous nephrolithotomy (pcnl) procedure in the kidney performed on (b)(6) 2020.Reportedly, the laser unit used was an auriga xl laser console with laser settings of 3500 millijoules and 12 hertz.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the fiber connector was burning and smoke was coming out from it.Upon removal of the laser fiber it was noticed that the connector was very hot.The laser connector fell off and separated from the rest of the fiber.Reportedly, there was no burn injury to the user or to the patient.The procedure was completed with the original device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block e1: initial reporter city (b)(6).Block h6: problem code 1437 captures the reportable event of fiber connector overheats.Problem code 1069 captures the reportable event of fiber broke.Block h10: investigation results the returned lighttrail single use 600um laser fiber was analyzed, and a visual evaluation noted that it was returned broken in two pieces.The first piece measured approximately 4.4 cm from the top of the connector to the break.The second piece measured approximately 305.3 cm from the break and includes the entire distal tip.Visual examination revealed that the exposed glass fiber tip measured approximately 6 mm and appeared unused.Examination under magnification confirmed that the tip was unused.Visual inspection of the returned fiber noted burn marks on the fiber jacketing and connector hub, likely a result of the fiber break occurring during used, resulting in a misfire.The condition of the returned device confirms that the fiber was broken during use, likely as a result of handling of the device as it was used and interacted with the scope.No other issues with the device were noted.The reported event was confirmed.The analysis of the returned device confirmed that the fiber was broken and burn marks indicated that there was likely a misfire.A break occurring during use could result in laser energy escaping, resulting in a misfire.Review and analysis of all available information indicated that the root cause is adverse event related to procedure.A complaint with a cause of adverse event related to procedure indicates that the adverse event occurred during the procedure and the device had no influence on event.A review of the manufacturing documentation for this device revealed that no anomalies or deviations related to the event occurred during manufacturing.A product labeling review identified that the device was used per the directions for use (dfu) / product label.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|