|
As reported, during attempted retrieval of a cook gunther tulip vena cava filter, which had been in place for thirteen years, a cloversnare 4-loop vascular retriever snare (subject of this report) came out of the catheter as the device was pulled.This occurred after disengagement of the snare, and the ivc filter hook appeared straightened.Another cloversnare 4-loop vascular retriever was then used.The second snare's loop "broke" as tension was held and the user attempted to advance and 16 french sheath over the snare (the second event will be reported under patient identifier (b)(6)).The procedure was completed using a distal loop snare technique, using an unknown exchange-length wire, reverse curve catheter, and 16 french sheath.Imaging in the form of ultrasound did not suggest any adverse effects to the patient.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Summary of event: as reported, during attempted retrieval of a cook gunther tulip vena cava filter, which had been in place for thirteen years, a cloversnare 4-loop vascular retriever snare (subject of this report) came out of the catheter as the device was pulled.This occurred after disengagement of the snare, and the ivc filter hook appeared straightened.Another cloversnare 4-loop vascular retriever was then used.The second snare's loop "broke" as tension was held and the user attempted to advance and 16 french sheath over the snare (the second event will be reported under patient identifier (b)(6)).The procedure was completed using a distal loop snare technique, using an unknown exchange-length wire, reverse curve catheter, and 16 french sheath.Imaging in the form of ultrasound did not suggest any adverse effects to the patient.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation evaluation: a review of the complaint history, device history record, documentation, drawing, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, quality control, and a visual inspection of the complaint device were conducted during the investigation.Visual inspection of the complaint device confirmed the return of one used sheath and clover snare.Biomatter was present on the device.The end hole of the sheath was damaged, and a three-centimeter white stress mark was observed on the distal end of the sheath.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were found, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The complaint file, device history record, complaint history, validations, and manufacturing documents provide objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.The product ifu states: ¿excessive force should not be used to manipulate or retrieve foreign objects." a review of the manufacturer¿s instructions and quality control procedures was conducted, and no gaps were discovered.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that a definitive cause for the event cannot be established.The ifu warns against use of excessive force, which is a possible cause of this failure mode.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no action was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|