The involved device is not under a service contract and thus, the hospital's biomed was seeking dräger's assistance.After initial log review the entire motor assembly was replaced which has put back the device into fully operable condition.The replaced motor was returned to the manufacturer and it's evaluation confirms the results obtained from initial log file analysis.Checking the motor in a specific test stand revealed that wear and tear at the collector disc of the motor led to partly disrupted electrical contact to the carbon brushes which results in fluctuations in rotating speed.The supervisor function monitors the motor speed continuously and compares the expected piston position with the one derived by the encoder check.If deviations are detected the device will force a shutdown of automatic ventilation to prevent from damages to the ventilator unit.This is accompanied by a corresponding alarm; manual ventilation as well as the monitoring functions remain available.No patient consequences have occurred and dräger finally concludes that the primus workstation responded as designed upon the malfunction of a single component that became worn after approx.Twelve years of operation.In comparison to the specified lifetime of ten years this can be considered acceptable.The number of similar cases, related to the same root cause, is within the expected range of the respective risk assessment and thus accepted.
|