| Model Number |
11827 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Insufficient Flow or Under Infusion (2182); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
02/26/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Sales representative reported a prometra pump explant due to underinfusions.Representative reported that there were multiple underinfusions observed, dates and volumes unknown.Representative reported that a cap study was performed and results showed a patent catheter.The prometra pump was explanted and replaced with a prometra ii pump on (b)(6) 2020.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Sales representative reported a prometra pump explant due to underinfusions.Representative reported there were multiple underinfusions observed, dates and volumes unknown.Representative reported a cap study was performed and results showed a patent catheter.The prometra pump was explanted and replaced with a prometra ii pump.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Although requested several times, the patient's original pump that was explanted could not be returned for additional evaluation and investigation.When post market surveillance inquired about the location of the device, the representative stated that the location is unknown and the office is unaware of the location either.A review of the device history record, which includes verification of all steps in the manufacturing of the pump, verification of all final testing performed by/on the pump, verification of sterilization, and packaging for subject pump was performed.The review did not identify any non-conformances, issues or capas associated with pump function.As the patient's pump was unable to be returned for additional evaluation and investigation, a definitive root cause for the alleged volume discrepancies was not able to be confirmed.Internal complaint # - (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device was returned for additional evaluation and investigation.A review of the device history record, which includes verification of all steps in the manufacturing of the pump, verification of all final testing performed by/on the pump, verification of sterilization, and packaging for subject pump was performed.The review did not identify any nonconformances, issues or capas associated with pump function.Additional physical investigation was performed on the device, confirming the alleged issue.Operation of the pump reservoir function was checked by filling the reservoir with 20ml of sterile water for injection and allowing the reservoir's pressure to return the fluid into the syringe.The reservoir was filled and the cap was flushed with 5ml of swi.A demand bolus of 0.300mg with a 1.00mg/ml concentration over 16 minutes was programmed with a programmer.Fluid droplets were observed at the tip of the stem indicating proper priming of the pump.The pump was programmed with a 1.994 mg daily dose multi-rate flow test over a 24- hour time period at 37 degrees for one day.The dispensed volume was 0% of the expected.The catheter access port and suture ring were removed and the pump was decontaminated a second time.The "pull open/hold open" currents were measured and the results showed that the current required to pull open both the inlet and outlet valves exceeded the design specification for the valve.Internal complaint number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|