|
Additional pro-code: hwc.Investigation summary: product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.A review of the device history record.Device history lot device history review done by (b)(6) on 05 mar 2020.Part number: 02.211.411.Lot number: 7665406.Part manufacture date: 17 apr 2014.Note: this is the date that the lot was released from warehouse.Manufacturing location: (b)(4).Part expiration date: n/a.Nonconformance noted: n/a.Dhr record review: a review of the device history record revealed no complaint related anomalies.The device history record shows this lot of 2.7mm va-locking anterolateral calcaneal plates was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no non-conformances or rework noted.The lot quantity of 40 pieces met all dimensional, visual and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.A review of the device history record for the raw material revealed no complaint related anomalies.The device history record shows this lot met all requirements at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device history batch null, device history review the lot quantity of (b)(4) pieces met all dimensional, visual and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2020, the surgeon performed a hardware removal due to pain on a calcaneus, everything came out successfully and removal was done.There was no patient consequence.This complaint involves seven (7) devices.This report is 1 of 7 for (b)(4).
|