This report is for an unknown pfna construct/ unknown lot.Part and lot numbers are unknown; udi number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/ investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/ or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
|
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: yoo, h., cho, y., and hwang, s.(2019), outcomes of combined neck and trochanter fractures of the femur treated with cephalomedullary nail in elderly, hip pelvis, vol.31(4), pages 200-205, (south korea).The purpose of the current study was to report the outcomes of combined neck and trochanter fractures of the femur treated with cmn in elderly patients.Between january 2010 and december 2014, a total of 33 patients (29 females and 4 males) wit an average age of 77 years (61-90 years) underwent internal fixation with cephalomedullary nail (cmn) using proximal femoral nail anti-rotation ii (pfna ii; synthes, oberdorf, switzerland).The following complications were reported as follows: 2 patients died fewer than three months after injury.(b)(6) year-old female patient had implant fracture and was revised with bipolar hemiarthroplasty.(b)(6) year-old female patient had a cut through and was revised with bipolar hemiarthroplasty.(b)(6) year-old female patient had a cut-out and was revised with bipolar hemiarthroplasty.(b)(6) year-old female patient a cut through and was revised with bipolar hemiarthroplasty.(b)(6) year-old male patient had implant loosening with persistent nonunion at the end of follow-up.He had refused revision surgery until 49 months after the index surgery because he had a little pain, low demand in daily life and many medical problems.This is report 5 of 5 for (b)(4).This is for a proximal femoral nail anti-rotation ii (pfna) construct.
|