|
Catalog Number UNKNOWN FILTER |
Device Problems
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problems
Pulmonary Embolism (1498); Abdominal Pain (1685); Atrial Fibrillation (1729)
|
Event Date 02/09/2008 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the lot number for the device was not provided, a manufacturing review could not be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.Journal article citation: hermsen, j.L., ibele, a.R., faucher, l.D., nale, j.K., schurr, m.J., & kudsk, k.A.(2008).Retrievable inferior vena cava filters in high-risk trauma and surgical patients: factors influencing successful removal.World journal of surgery, 32(7), 1444¿1449.Doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9462-z.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported in an article from the world journal of surgery titled " retrievable inferior vena cava filters in high-risk trauma and surgical patients: factors influencing successful removal " that 3 patients experienced nonfatal pulmonary embolism (pe) on 3,5 and 39 days after filter placement and received anticoagulation therapy.One patient experienced intractable abdominal pain as the filter strut was penetrating the duodenum, therefore, the filter was removed.One patient experienced post removal related atrial fibrillation requiring cardioversion with propafenone.The status of the patients was not provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a manufacturing review could not be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.Journal article citation: hermsen, j.L., ibele, a.R., faucher, l.D., nale, j.K., schurr, m.J., & kudsk, k.A.(2008).Retrievable inferior vena cava filters in high-risk trauma and surgical patients: factors influencing successful removal.World journal of surgery, 32(7), 1444¿1449.Doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9462-z.H10: b2, g4, h6 (conclusions).H11: h6 (device).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported in an article from the world journal of surgery titled " retrievable inferior vena cava filters in high-risk trauma and surgical patients: factors influencing successful removal " that 3 patients experienced nonfatal pulmonary embolism (pe) on 3,5 and 39 days after filter placement and received anticoagulation therapy.One patient experienced intractable abdominal pain as the filter strut was penetrating the duodenum, therefore, the filter was removed.One patient experienced postremoval related atrial fibrillation requiring cardioversion with propafenone.The status of the patients was not provided.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|