| Model Number |
0602850 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Disconnection (1171); Fracture (1260); Material Separation (1562); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Thrombus (2101); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
|
| Date of Event |
01/14/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The lot number for the device was not provided, therefore, the device history records could not be reviewed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that seven years six months post port device implant, the catheter allegedly detached from the hub and migrated to the right heart, which was revealed through imaging, echocardiogram, and trans-esophageal diagnostic tests.It was further reported that the catheter was visualized in the right atrium with an attached density suspected to a portion of the catheter or thrombus.Reportedly, the port body and catheter were removed without complication.The patient was discharged home and reported to be hemodynamically stable.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a lot history record could not be completed as the lot number was not provided.Investigation summary: one ti dome port with groshong catheter in two segments and one cathlock were returned for evaluation.Visual, microscopic, and functional evaluations were performed.The investigation is confirmed for a complete break in the catheter due to flexural fatigue, as a complete break in the catheter was identified approximately 1.7 cm from the distal end of the cathlock.Both cross-sectional surfaces at the complete break were observed to have a region that appeared to be smooth and polished with rounded edges and a region that appeared to be granular with sharper edges.The catheter lumen at the break appeared to have a flattened elliptical shape.A definitive root cause could not be determined.It is unknown whether patient and/or procedural factors contributed to the event.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that seven years six months post port device implant, the catheter allegedly detached from the hub and migrated to the right heart, which was revealed through imaging, echocardiogram, and trans-esophageal diagnostic tests.It was further reported that the catheter was visualized in the right atrium with an attached density suspected to a portion of the catheter or thrombus.Reportedly, the port body and catheter were removed without complication.The patient was discharged home and reported to be hemodynamically stable.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|