|
It was reported that a patient presented a calcar fracture.According to the complainant, the fracture was treated with cerclage wire.Therefore, the polarstem (75100467) intended for use in treatment was not returned for investigation.The device could therefore not be evaluated and the stated failure mode not independently be confirmed.To date no medical/clinical documentation has been provided.Without any supporting medical documentation, a thorough medical assessment could not be performed.A review of the batch record revealed no deviations from the standard manufacturing process.The ifu (lit.No.12.23 ed.05/16) identifies bone fracture as a known possible side effect resulting from a tha.A review of the complaint history revealed three similar complaints reported for the device in question.However, there is no indication that the device did not meet specification at the time of manufacturing and the failure mode and severity are covered in the risk file.Based on available information the root cause for the reported periprosthetic fracture cannot identified and stays undetermined.The need for corrective action is not deemed necessary.Nevertheless, smith and nephew will continue to monitor the device for similar issues.The complaint will be reopened should additional information be received or the a revision surgery take place.
|